SOF-CURL SSC7026Recalls & reported problems
Gyrus ACMI, LLC · 7.0 Fr. (2.3mm) x 26cm SOF-CURL URETERAL STENT · Class 2 · Implant
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00821925031753), received between Mar 10, 2023 and Mar 10, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Corroded” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Corroded1
- Degraded1
- Device Contamination with Body Fluid1
- Peeled/Delaminated1
- Sharp Edges1
Patient problems
- Urinary Tract Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 10, 2023Corroded; Degraded; Peeled/Delaminated; Device Contamination with Body Fluid; Sharp Edges; Corroded; Degraded; Peeled/Delaminated; Device Contamination with Body Fluid; Sharp Edges
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PROCEDURE INDICATED THAT THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURES WERE PERFORMED: CYSTOSCOPY, LEFT RETROGRADE URETEROPYELOGRAM, LEFT URETEROSCOPY, BALLOON DILATION AND INSERTION OF A LEFT URETERAL STENT. A QUESTIONABLE OBSTRUCTION WAS NOTED PRE-PROCEDURE. DURING THE PROCEDURE, THE PATIENT WAS GIVEN INTRAVENOUS ANTIBIOTICS. THE PROSTATE WAS NOTED TO HAVE OBSTRUCTING MEDIAL LOBES IN THE PROSTATE. NO FOREIGN BODIES WERE NOTED IN THE BLADDER. DURING THE RETROGRADE URETEROPYELOGRAM, THE PATIENT WAS NOTED TO HAVE A SEVERELY TORTUOUS DILATED URETER TO THE LEVEL OF THE DISTAL URETER AND BLADDER. A WIRE WAS INSERTED TO ADVANCE INTO THE LEFT RENAL COLLECTING SYSTEM. THE CYSTOSCOPE WAS REMOVED AND A SEMI RIGID URETEROSCOPE WAS INSERTED AND ADVANCED TO THE DISTAL URETER. SOME MUCUSAL EDEMA WAS NOTED BUT NO FOREIGN BODIES OR STONES WERE NOTED. THE SCOPE WAS ADVANCED TO MIDURETER, AND THE URETER WAS FOUND TO BE DILATED. URINE WAS COLLECTED AND SENT FOR CULTURE. AS THE AREA WAS EDEMATOUS, BALLOON DILATATION WAS DONE OF THAT AREA. THE URETERAL STENT WAS THEN PLACED WITH THE PROXIMAL CURL HE LEFT RENAL PELVIS AND THE DISTAL CURL IN THE BLADDER. THE PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE RECO
Patient problems: Urinary Tract Infection
MAUDE report 16527185 ↗
Other Stent, Ureteral devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.