Cook G02854Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Pressure Monitoring Tray Polyethylene Catheter · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002028548), received between Nov 26, 2019 and Apr 17, 2020 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Complete Blockage” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Complete Blockage5
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient2
- No Patient Involvement2
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 17, 2020Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN INSERTING A WIRE GUIDE THROUGH THE NEEDLE OF A SINGLE LUMEN POLYETHYLENE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER TRAY DURING AN ARTERIAL LINE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE USER WAS TESTING THE DEVICE BEDSIDE BEFORE STARTING THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. THE DEVICE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9971619 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2020Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS RESISTANCE WHEN INSERTING A WIRE GUIDE THROUGH THE NEEDLE OF A SINGLE LUMEN POLYETHYLENE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER TRAY DURING AN ARTERIAL LINE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE. THE USER WAS TESTING THE DEVICE BEDSIDE BEFORE STARTING THE PROCEDURE WHEN THE RESISTANCE WAS NOTED. THE DEVICE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 9962800 ↗MalfunctionApr 14, 2020Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE NEEDLE OF A SINGLE LUMEN POLYETHYLENE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER TRAY DID NOT GIVE BLOOD RETURN DURING AN ARTERIAL PRESSURE MONITORING PROCEDURE. AFTER INSERTION, SALINE WAS FLUSHED THROUGH THE NEEDLE AND THE WIRE GUIDE WAS ATTEMPTED TO BE ADVANCED THROUGH THE NEEDLE. WHEN THE USER INSERTED THE NEEDLE, THEY DID NOT GET "FLASHBACK" AND EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY INSERTING THE WIRE GUIDE THROUGH THE NEEDLE. IT WAS STATED THAT "IT IS SUSPECTED THAT THE VESSEL HAD NOT BEEN ACCESSED". THE PATIENT WAS ALREADY IN THE ICU AT THE TIME OF THE EVENT AND WAS RECEIVING THE DEVICE FOR ARTERIAL PRESSURE MONITORING. A NEW KIT WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9959067 ↗MalfunctionMar 13, 2020Complete Blockage; Complete Blockage
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE WIRE GUIDE WOULD NOT PASS THROUGH THE NEEDLE INCLUDED IN A SINGLE LUMEN POLYETHYLENE CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER TRAY. WHILE PLACING A PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL LINE, THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNABLE TO GET BLOOD RETURN DESPITE USING AN ULTRASOUND FOR VISUAL AID. AT THIS POINT, THE PHYSICIAN COULD NOT ADVANCE THE WIRE GUIDE THROUGH THE NEEDLE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. AFTER "A COUPLE OF ATTEMPTS", THE PHYSICIAN OBTAINED A SECOND KIT. UNFORTUNATELY, THE PHYSICIAN RAN INTO THE SAME ISSUE. EVENTUALLY, THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO GET THE WIRE THROUGH THE NEEDLE "WITH SOME DIFFICULTY" BUT "FELT A POP" RIGHT BEFORE. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS TO THE PATIENT HAVE BEEN REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9830940 ↗MalfunctionNov 26, 2019Complete Blockage; Delivered as Unsterile Product; Complete Blockage; Delivered as Unsterile Product
NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT/EVENT INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9377446 ↗
Other CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS devices
- WATCHMAN FXD Curve™ Access System M635TU80020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall47 deaths654 reports
- NA C315HIS02Medtronic, Inc. · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall369 reports
- WATCHMAN TruSteer™ Access System M635TU90050Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall28 deaths302 reports
- Guidezilla™ II H7493933515060Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS1 recall3 deaths278 reports
- Velocity Delivery Microcatheter VEL160STR-APenumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS297 reports
- Guidezilla™ H7493924215050Boston Scientific Corporation · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS294 reports
- WATCHMAN™ TruSeal™ Access System M635TU70020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, percutaneous1 recall11 deaths217 reports
- Lantern Delivery Catheter PXSLIMLAN135T45Penumbra, Inc. · CATHETER, PERCUTANEOUS220 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page