Cook G06425Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Multi-Sideport Catheter Infusion Set Dual Check Valve · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002064256), received between Nov 28, 2017 and May 24, 2019 — classified as 1 injury, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Delivered as Unsterile Product” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Delivered as Unsterile Product1
- Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
- Material Separation1
- Unraveled Material1
Patient problems
- No Patient Involvement2
- No Code Available1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 24, 2019Delivered as Unsterile Product; Delivered as Unsterile Product
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 8640245 ↗MalfunctionAug 24, 2018Unraveled Material; Unraveled Material
IT WAS REPORTED, THE MULTI-SIDEPORT DUAL CHECK VALVE CATHETER INFUSION SET DISPLAYED "AN EXCESSIVE ELASTIC ELONGATION WITH RISK OF RUPTURE" UPON REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY. DURING THE PROCEDURE TO TREAT A RIGHT FEMORAL-POPLITEAL OBSTRUCTION WITH LOCAL FIBRINOLYTIC TREATMENT, THERE WAS DIFFICULTY IN ADVANCING THE COMPLAINT DEVICE FROM THE HUMERAL ACCESS TO THE RIGHT FEMORAL-POPLITEAL OBSTRUCTION. PER THE COMPLAINANT, THE PATIENT HAD DIFFUSE AORTIC AND ILIAC CALCIFICATIONS BUT NO TORTUOSITY OF THE VASCULATURE. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE, THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A SECOND CATHETER OF THE SAME TYPE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE COMPLAINANT, THE COMPLAINT DEVICE WILL NOT BE RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR INVESTIGATION.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7814063 ↗MalfunctionMar 1, 2018Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING INSPECTION OF THE MULTI-SIDEPORT DUAL CHECK VALVE CATHETER INFUSION SET, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THERE WAS A HAIR INSIDE OF THE PRIMARY PACKAGE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED AND DID NOT COME INTO CONTACT WITH A PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Patient Involvement
MAUDE report 7305829 ↗InjuryNov 28, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING LOWER EXTREMITY THROMBOLYSIS, AS THE MULTI-SIDEPORT DUAL CHECK VALVE CATHETER INFUSION SET CATHETER WAS BEING REMOVED, THE MARKER BANDS SEPARATED FROM THE CATHETER SHAFT AND STOPPED IN THE TIBIAL ARTERIES - ONE IN THE ANTERIOR AND ONE IN THE POSTERIOR. THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED ACUTE THROMBOSIS OF THE POSTERIOR AND ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERIES AS A RESULT OF THIS EVENT. THE MARKER BANDS WERE ABLE TO BE SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED WITH ADDITIONAL THROMBOLYSIS USING A DISTAL EMBOLIZATION PROTECTION DEVICE WITH A CAROTID BALLOON CATHETER.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7064070 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page