Skip to content

C-Flex G14637Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · C-Flex Double Pigtail Ureteral Stent Set · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
7
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002146372), received between Sep 8, 2016 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 1 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 2 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Flaked2
  • Material Separation2
  • Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material1
  • Device Damaged by Another Device1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient4
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
  • No Patient Involvement1

Recent adverse event reports

The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryMar 24, 2026Flaked

    THIS EVENT NO LONGER MEETS THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR A REPORTABLE EVENT. SEE H11.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24674729 ↗
  • InjuryMar 24, 2026Flaked

    THIS EVENT NO LONGER MEETS THE QUALIFICATIONS FOR A REPORTABLE EVENT. SEE H11.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 24674654 ↗
  • InjuryJan 21, 2026Break

    AS REPORTED, DURING A CYSTOSCOPY PROCEDURE, THE TIP OF THE 4.0 FR/70 CM STENT INCLUDED IN THE 'C-FLEX DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET' BROKE INSIDE OF PATIENT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EVENT DETAILS HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient; Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 24131818 ↗
  • InjurySep 27, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation

    ADDITIONAL AND CORRECTED INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED ON 20OCT2021: THE STENT WAS PLACED ON (B)(6) 2021, AND IT WAS REMOVED ON (B)(6) 2021 WHEN THE NOTED MALFUNCTION OCCURRED.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 12533805 ↗
  • MalfunctionOct 2, 2019Material Separation; Device Damaged by Another Device; Material Separation; Device Damaged by Another Device

    NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE LAST REPORT WAS SUBMITTED ON 02OCT2019.

    Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient

    MAUDE report 9145623 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 30, 2018Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material; Device Contamination with Chemical or Other Material

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THERE WAS A RED STRING PARTICLE TYPE FIBER INSIDE THE C-FLEX DOUBLE PIGTAIL URETERAL STENT SET PACKAGING. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THIS REPORTED ISSUE. THE DEVICE DID NOT MAKE CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Patient Involvement

    MAUDE report 7552789 ↗
  • InjurySep 8, 2016Break; Break

    INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED THAT UPON RETRIEVAL OF THE URETERAL STENT OUT OF THE PATIENT, THE STENT BROKE OFF INTO 2 PIECES. THE SURGEON HAD TO RESCOPE THE PATIENT TO SEE IF HE COULD ENDOSCOPICALLY RETRIEVE THE REST OF THE STENT. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO GRASP THE REST OF THE STENT AND PULL IT OUT THROUGH THE URETHRA. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES NOR EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 5935610 ↗

Other STENT, URETERAL devices

All STENT, URETERAL devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.