CXI G18369Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · CXI Support Catheter · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002183698), received between Apr 15, 2022 and Dec 16, 2022 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 16, 2022Break; Break
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED 24JAN2023. THE TARGET LOCATION WAS THE ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY VIA PEDAL ACCESS. THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS CALCIFIED AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S SHEATH WAS USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. UPON REMOVAL OF THE CXI OVER THE WIRE, RESISTANCE WAS FELT AS THE CXI WAS "STUCK" ON THE WIRE. THE SEPARATED TIP WAS REMOVED OVER THE WIRE. A POWER INJECTOR WAS NOT USED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15998605 ↗MalfunctionApr 15, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED, AT THE BEGINNING OF A PROCEDURE INVOLVING THE POSTERIOR TIBIAL TRUNK VIA POSTERIOR TIBIAL ACCESS, THE DISTAL TIP OF A CXI SUPPORT CATHETER SEPARATED INSIDE THE PATIENT. AN UNSPECIFIED COOK PEDAL ACCESS KIT AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURER'S 0.014-INCH WIRE WERE ALSO USED DURING THE PROCEDURE. THE HYDROPHILIC COATING WAS ACTIVATED. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED UPON INSERTION OF THE DEVICE DUE TO SEVERELY CALCIFIED ANATOMY. A POWER INJECTOR WAS NOT USED. THE SEPARATED PORTION OF THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED OVER THE WIRE GUIDE AND ANOTHER CXI CATHETER WAS USED TO SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 14120220 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.