CXI G23863Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · CXI Support Catheter · Class 2
All models of CXI (34)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00827002238633), received between Jan 2, 2020 and Jan 2, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Crack” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Crack1
- Fluid/Blood Leak1
Patient problems
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJan 2, 2020Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak; Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak
AS REPORTED, DURING AN UNKNOWN PROCEDURE, A CXI SUPPORT CATHETER LEAKED AND WAS LATER FOUND TO BE CRACKED. ACCESS WAS OBTAINED MIDWAY DOWN THE RIGHT ANTERIOR TIBIAL ARTERY TO REACH THE DORSALIS PEDIS ARTERY. A COOK APPROACH HYDRO ST MICROWIRE WIRE GUIDE WAS USED WITH THE DEVICE. THE DIABETIC PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS SEVERELY CALCIFIED AND THE VESSELS WERE SMALL. RESISTANCE WAS ENCOUNTERED UPON ADVANCEMENT OF THE DEVICE, AND FORTY-FIVE MINUTES INTO THE PROCEDURE, THE WIRE GUIDE AND THE CXI BECAME "BALLED UP". AS THE DEVICES WERE BEING REMOVED, APPROXIMATELY TWO MILLIMETERS OF THE WIRE GUIDE SEPARATED IN THE PATIENT BY THE ANTERIOR ARTERY REGION. THIS WILL BE REPORTED UNDER PATIENT IDENTIFIER (B)(6). A NEW WIRE WAS INSERTED AND THE PROCEDURE WAS CONTINUED. THE PHYSICIAN THEN NOTICED THAT THE CXI WAS LEAKING AND THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED, AT WHICH TIME THE CXI WAS FOUND TO BE CRACKED DOWN THE SHAFT. ANOTHER COOK CATHETER WAS THEN INTRODUCED BUT THE LESION WAS UNABLE TO BE CROSSED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO OPEN TWO VESSELS, BUT NOT THE ANTERIOR VESSELS. THERE ARE NO FURTHER PROCEDURES SCHEDULED AT THIS TIME. A SECTION OF THE COMPLAINT DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PAT
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 9538051 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page