Skip to content

Vital-Port G26449Recalls & reported problems

Cook Incorporated · Vital-Port Vascular Access System, Standard M.R.I. 6.5 Fr · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Vital-Port (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00827002264496), received between Feb 15, 2017 and Feb 15, 2017 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Separation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionFeb 15, 2017Material Separation; Material Separation

    INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT A PATIENT HAD A VITAL-PORT VASCULAR ACCESS SYSTEM IMPLANTED FOR AN UNSPECIFIED INDICATION. THE SPECIFIC SITE AND ROUTE OF IMPLANTATION WAS NOT PROVIDED. THE DEVICE ALLEGEDLY BROKE AT AN UNSPECIFIED TIME FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION. THE SIGNS, SYMPTOMS, CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS THAT PROMPTED A RETURN OF THE PATIENT AND INDICATED A BREAK OF THE DEVICE WERE NOT PROVIDED. X-RAYS WERE TAKEN AND CONFIRMED THAT DEVICE BROKE / SEPARATED. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE HOSPITAL FOR EXPLANT OF THE PORT AND REMOVAL OF THE CATHETER FROM THE RIGHT ATRIUM. ONE OF THE PEDIATRIC PHYSICIANS WITH KNOWLEDGE OF THE EVENT PROVIDED ADDITIONAL DETAILS STATING THAT THE PATIENT WAS ADMITTED TO THE HOSPITAL UNDER THE PEDIATRIC CARDIOLOGY AND ADULT INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY SERVICES. "THE TUBING AND THE DEVICE ITSELF WERE COMPLETELY SEPARATED AND THE TUBING HAD MIGRATED INTO THE PATIENT SO THAT THE TIP LAY IN THE RIGHT VENTRICLE. THIS POSED A RISK FOR CARDIAC ARRHYTHMIA AS WELL AS PULMONARY EMBOLUS." "THE PATIENT WAS NOT SYMPTOMATIC BUT WAS AT RISK OF A LIFE THREATENING COMPLICATION SHOULD AN ARRHYTHMIA OR EMBOLUS OCCUR. " THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO REMOVE THE CATHET

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 6332169 ↗

Other PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices

All PORT & CATHETER, IMPLANTED, SUBCUTANEOUS, INTRAVASCULAR devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page