Turbo-Flo HD G35082Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Cook Turbo-Flo HD Hemodialysis Catheter Set Double Lumen Polyurethane · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002350823), received between May 17, 2018 and May 18, 2018 — classified as 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Difficult to Remove” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Difficult to Remove1
- Uncoiled1
Patient problems
- Needle Stick/Puncture1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 18, 2018Uncoiled
THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE WIRE UNTANGLED DURING INSERTION OF THE COOK TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER INTO THE RIGHT INTRA JUGULAR VEIN. THERE WERE NO REPORTED SERIOUS INJURIES TO THE PATIENT AS A RESULT OF THE PRODUCT PROBLEM.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7525836 ↗MalfunctionMay 17, 2018Difficult to Remove
THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT THE COOK TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER WAS SUCCESSFULLY PLACED, BUT THE PHYSICIAN EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY WHEN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE WIRE. THE PHYSICIAN HAD TO USE FORCE WHEN REMOVING THE WIRE WHICH RESULTED IN UNTANGLING OF THE WIRE. THE CATHETER WAS REMOVED AND ANOTHER PUNCTURE OF THE SUBCLAVIAN VEIN WAS REQUIRED TO INSERT A NEW VASCULAR CATHETER. NO SECTIONS OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE OF THE PATIENT'S BODY AS A RESULT OF THE PRODUCT PROBLEM, AND THERE WAS NO OTHER PATIENT IMPACT REPORTED.
Patient problems: Needle Stick/Puncture
MAUDE report 7523792 ↗
Other CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED devices
- MAHURKAR 8888135191Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall175 reports
- MAHURKAR 8888135241Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall1 death100 reports
- ARROW IPN036723Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls2 reports
- ARROW IPN036412Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- DuoGlide catheter 5625240Bard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- ARROW IPN036428Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN036419Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN927343Teleflex Incorporated · Catheter, hemodialysis, non-implanted2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page