Turbo-Flo HD G35083Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Cook Turbo-Flo HD Hemodialysis Catheter Set Double Lumen Polyurethane · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 4
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002350830), received between Jun 13, 2017 and May 3, 2018 — classified as 4 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fluid/Blood Leak” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Fluid/Blood Leak3
- Crack1
- Leak/Splash1
Patient problems
- Blood Loss2
- No Code Available2
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMay 3, 2018Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
IT WAS REPORTED THE VENOUS LINE OF A TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY, WHICH RESULTED IN SOME DROPS OF BLOOD LOSS DESPITE IT BEING CLAMPED. DURING THE INITIAL INSERTION OF THE CATHETER, BEFORE CORRECT PLACEMENT WAS CONFIRMED, THE 2 LUMENS WERE CLAMPED OFF LEAVING ONLY THE CONNECTOR FREE. AT THIS TIME, THE CATHETER WAS OBSERVED TO BE LEAKING BLOOD AND NOT FUNCTIONING AS INTENDED. THE CATHETER REMAINED IN PLACE AND ITS REMOVAL DATE IS UNKNOWN. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE EVENT AND CURRENT PATIENT STATUS IS UNKNOWN.
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 7484700 ↗InjuryMar 19, 2018Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak; Crack; Fluid/Blood Leak
THE INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT, UPON STARTING THE PATIENT'S DIALYSIS THERAPY IN WHICH A COOK TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER SET WAS USED IN THE FEMORAL VEIN, SMALL BUBBLES WERE SEEN IN THE TUBING OF THE DEVICE. THE LUER LOCK WAS CHECKED, AND EVERYTHING APPEARED TO BE NORMAL. HOWEVER, SMALL BUBBLES WERE STILL OBSERVED ALONG THE ARTERIAL STRETCH. THE CUSTOMER THEN NOTICED THAT THE CONNECTION OF THE ARTERIAL STRETCH IS SLIGHTLY BROKEN, AND THAT A BLOOD LEAK WAS STAINING THE GAUZE THAT WAS UNDERNEATH IT. THE CATHETER ULTIMATELY HAD TO BE CHANGED OUT. THE PRODUCT IS UNAVAILABLE FOR RETURN AND EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 7348927 ↗InjuryDec 7, 2017Fluid/Blood Leak; Fluid/Blood Leak
THE INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE VENOUS LINE OF THE TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER DID NOT CLOSE PROPERLY, WHICH RESULTED IN SOME DROPS OF BLOOD LOSS EVEN THOUGH THE LINE WAS CLAMPED. DURING THE INITIAL INSERTION OF THE CATHETER, BEFORE CORRECT PLACEMENT WAS CONFIRMED, THE 2 LUMENS WERE CLAMPED OFF, LEAVING ONLY THE CONNECTOR FREE DURING THAT STAGE OF THE PROCEDURE. HOWEVER, IT WAS AT THIS TIME THAT THE VENOUS LINE OF THE CATHETER LEAKED BLOOD. FROM THAT POINT ON, IT WAS OBSERVED THAT THE CLAMP DID NOT WORK WELL. THE CATHETER REMAINED IN PLACE. THE DEVICE HAS SINCE BEEN REMOVED AND IS REPORTED TO BE AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATION, HOWEVER, THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED TO DATE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RECEIVED WHICH PROVIDED CLARIFICATION OF PATIENT OUTCOME. "THERE WAS NO ADVERSE EVENT FOR PATIENT. ONLY SOME DROPS OF BLOOD ESCAPE FROM CATHETER. NOTHING IMPORTANT, BUT IT SHOULD NOT LEAK WHEN CLAMPING. NO TRANSFUSION NEEDED, NOTHING INJURY FOR PATIENT."
Patient problems: Blood Loss
MAUDE report 7097197 ↗InjuryJun 13, 2017Leak/Splash; Leak/Splash
INTERNATIONAL CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE COOK TURBO-FLO HD HEMODIALYSIS CATHETER WAS IN USE FOR TREATMENT. CUSTOMER STATES "DESPITE THE FORCEPS BEING CLOSED THE BLOOD KEPT FLOWING." THE CUSTOMER REPORTS THAT ANOTHER CATHETER WAS NEEDED. NO FURTHER PATIENT OR EVENT DETAILS WERE PROVIDED. THE DEVICE WAS RECEIVED BY THE MANUFACTURER FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 6636177 ↗
Other CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED devices
- MAHURKAR 8888135191Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall175 reports
- MAHURKAR 8888135241Mozarc Medical US LLC · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED1 recall1 death100 reports
- ARROW IPN036723Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls2 reports
- ARROW IPN036412Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- DuoGlide catheter 5625240Bard Access Systems, Inc. · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls1 report
- ARROW IPN036428Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN036419Teleflex Incorporated · CATHETER, HEMODIALYSIS, NON-IMPLANTED2 recalls0 reports
- ARROW IPN927343Teleflex Incorporated · Catheter, hemodialysis, non-implanted2 recalls0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page