Universa G49874Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Universa Firm Ureteral Stent Set With Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 8
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 8 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002498747), received between Apr 11, 2017 and Aug 5, 2026 — classified as 8 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Crack1
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Fracture1
- Material Separation1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Split1
- Torn Material1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient4
Recent adverse event reports
The 8 most recent of 8 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 5, 2026Unsealed Device Packaging
Additional information received on 23AUG2026 stating that the device was unsealed.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 50145047 ↗MalfunctionJan 5, 2026Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE STENT OF THE UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET BROKE DURING PLACEMENT IN THE URETER. THE BREAK WAS DETECTED WHEN THE USER ADJUSTED THE STENT¿S LOCATION AND NOTICED BREAKAGE AFTER PULLING THE STENT OUT SLIGHTLY. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED USING A NEW DEVICE. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 23956912 ↗MalfunctionOct 15, 2024Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THE UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET'S STENT WAS BROKEN PRIOR AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE. THE ISSUE WAS FOUND WHEN THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED FROM THE PACKAGE AND THE USER CUT OFF THE TETHER. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY USING ANOTHER SAME-LIKE DEVICE. AS REPORTED, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS OR REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THE DEVICE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20456636 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2021Material Separation; Material Separation
AS REPORTED, AFTER OPENING THE PACKAGE OF A UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET, THE STENT WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED BY CHANGING TO ANOTHER NEW DEVICE OF THE SAME TYPE. THIS OCCURRED PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT; THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING EVENT DETAILS, PATIENT ANATOMY AND OUTCOME HAS BEEN REQUESTED BUT IS NOT AVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12217586 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2020Fracture; Fracture
AS REPORTED, THE USER OPENED THE PACKAGE FOR A UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET, AND THE TIP OF THE DEVICE WAS BROKEN. A PHOTO OF THE DEVICE PROVIDED BY THE USER APPEARS TO SHOW A PARTIAL SEPARATION ON THE PIGTAIL OF THE DEVICE. THE DEVICE WAS NOT USED ON THE PATIENT. THE USER CHANGED TO A NEW DEVICE AND COMPLETED THE PROCEDURE SUCCESSFULLY. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED DUE TO THE ALLEGED MALFUNCTION.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 10815816 ↗MalfunctionJul 23, 2019Crack; Material Split, Cut or Torn; Crack; Material Split, Cut or Torn
UPDATE 05AUG2019: THE USER CUT THE TETHER DURING THE PROCEDURE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8817919 ↗MalfunctionApr 12, 2018Split; Torn Material
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO THE PROCEDURE, THERE WAS A SPLIT IN THE URETERAL STENT. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT ONE COIL WAS TORN IN TWO LOCATIONS. THERE WAS NO HARM TO THE PATIENT REPORTED.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7425771 ↗MalfunctionApr 11, 2017Detachment of Device or Device Component; Detachment of Device or Device Component
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE USER OPENED THE PACKAGE AND FOUND THE UNIVERSA FIRM URETERAL STENT SET WAS SEPARATED INTO TWO PARTS. THE DEVICE DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT; THEREFORE, THERE WAS NO IMPACT TO THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6481741 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page