Universa G49933Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Universa Soft Ureteral Stent Set with Hydrophilic Coating · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 11
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 11 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002499331), received between May 16, 2017 and Aug 2, 2022 — classified as 1 injury, 10 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break5
- Material Separation3
- Device Damaged Prior to Use1
- Material Split, Cut or Torn1
- Peeled/Delaminated1
- Wrinkled1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient5
- No Code Available1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 11 most recent of 11 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionAug 2, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED, DURING A ENDOSCOPIC URETHROTOMY, UPON OPENING THE PACKAGE OF A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET, THE DEVICE WAS FOUND TO BE BROKEN. THE BREAK WAS FOUND ON THE TETHERED END OF THE STENT. THE DEVICE WAS REPLACED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT'S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THE COMPLAINANT HAS NOT REPORTED ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 15152784 ↗MalfunctionMar 9, 2022Material Separation; Material Separation
AS REPORTED, WHEN ADVANCING A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT OVER THE PUSHER, THE STENT SEPARATED. THE DEVICE DID NOT MAKE PATIENT CONTACT. A PHOTO OF THE DEVICE SHOWS THE SEPARATION OCCURRED AT THE PROXIMAL PIGTAIL AT THE NON-TETHER END. A NEW STENT SET WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. A SECTION OF THE DEVICE DID NOT REMAIN INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE ANY ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13713627 ↗MalfunctionFeb 18, 2022Break; Break
AS REPORTED, DURING A RETROGRADE INTRARENAL SURGERY A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT WAS USED. THEY PHYSICIAN WANTED TO INSERT THE DEVICE INTO THE PATIENT'S URETERAL. WHEN THE OR NURSE OPENED THE DEVICE PACKAGE THEY NOTICED THAT ONE SIDE OF THE PIGTAIL LOOP WAS RUPTURED. THE PHYSICIAN USED ANOTHER NEW SAME TYPE DEVICE TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE WITHOUT DIFFICULTY. NO UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE OF THE PATIENT'S BODY. NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE. NO ADVERSE EFFECTS WERE REPORTED DUE TO THE OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13560099 ↗MalfunctionNov 10, 2021Break; Break
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION TO REPORT SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12787675 ↗MalfunctionDec 16, 2020Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation; Peeled/Delaminated; Material Separation
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions; No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 11016803 ↗InjuryMay 18, 2020Material Separation; Material Separation
NO NEW PATIENT OR EVENT INFORMATION SINCE THE LAST REPORT WAS SUBMITTED.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 10065185 ↗MalfunctionJun 6, 2019Material Split, Cut or Torn; Material Split, Cut or Torn
NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING THE PATIENT AND/OR EVENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED SINCE THE PREVIOUS MEDWATCH REPORT WAS SENT.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 8677316 ↗MalfunctionJul 12, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PRIOR TO PATIENT CONTACT THE CATHETER BROKE THE MOMENT IT WAS PUT ON THE GUIDE. THERE WERE NO ADVERSE EFFECTS ON THE PATIENT DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7682799 ↗MalfunctionJul 11, 2018Break; Break
IT WAS REPORTED DURING A URETEROSCOPY AND LASER STONE FRAGMENTATION (URSL) PROCEDURE WHILE USING THE UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET THE PHYSICIAN FOUND THE PUSHER HAD BROKEN. AS REPORTED, HE USED ANOTHER NEW UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET TO FINISH THIS MEDICAL PROCEDURE AND WITHOUT DIFFICULTIES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED CONCERNING THE PATIENT AND EVENT.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 7678534 ↗MalfunctionAug 30, 2017Wrinkled; Wrinkled
DURING AN UNSPECIFIED PROCEDURE, THE OPERATOR DETECTED THAT THE CATHETER OF UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET WAS WRINKLED. THE OPERATOR REMOVED THE STENT SET FROM THE PATIENT¿S BODY. AT THIS TIME IT IS UNKNOWN HOW THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED. NO UNINTENDED SECTION OF THE DEVICE REMAINED INSIDE THE PATIENT¿S BODY. THE PATIENT DID NOT REQUIRE AN ADDITIONAL PROCEDURE DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. ACCORDING TO THE INITIAL REPORTER, THE PATIENT DID NOT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6829605 ↗MalfunctionMay 16, 2017Device Damaged Prior to Use; Device Damaged Prior to Use
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE DIAGNOSTIC URETEROSCOPY PROCEDURE, WHEN THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABOUT TO REMOVE THE THREADS, A UNIVERSA SOFT URETERAL STENT SET WAS FOUND SEPARATED PRIOR TO USE. THE DEVICE DID NOT COME IN CONTACT WITH THE PATIENT. THERE WAS NO PATIENT HARM REPORTED AND NO ADDITIONAL PROCEDURES WERE REQUIRED BECAUSE OF THIS FAILURE. IT IS UNKNOWN IF THE INTENDED PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED OR NOT. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WAS REQUESTED REGARDING THE FAILURE OF THE DEVICE. NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 6568474 ↗
Other STENT, URETERAL devices
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL1 recall100 reports
- Bard® InLay Optima® Ureteral Stent 788626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL122 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL118 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent with HydroGlide™ Guidewire 777426C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL108 reports
- Bard® InLay® Ureteral Stent 778626C. R. Bard, Inc. · STENT, URETERAL100 reports
- Percuflex™ Plus M0061752530Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 death99 reports
- Contour VL™ M0061801560Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL1 recall45 reports
- Polaris™ Ultra M0061921330Boston Scientific Corporation · STENT, URETERAL71 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 13, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 13, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page