Cook G54573Recalls & reported problems
Cook Incorporated · Disposable Hysteroscopic Polyp Snare · Class 2
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00827002545731), received between Feb 20, 2017 and Dec 6, 2018 — classified as 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Break2
- Device Operates Differently Than Expected1
- Physical Resistance/Sticking1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
- Pain1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionDec 6, 2018Break
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE HYSTEROSCOPY POLYP REMOVAL PROCEDURE, SNARE AND THE END OF THE DUCKBILL WERE BROKEN. POLYP WAS NOT ABLE RETRIEVED WITH THE BROKEN SNARE. ENDOMETRIUM WAS SWOLLEN BECAUSE OF THE POLYP SNARE; THEREFORE, THE PROCEDURE WAS RESCHEDULED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8138772 ↗MalfunctionDec 6, 2018Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking
THE COMPLAINANT REPORTED THAT DURING THE HYSTEROSCOPY POLYP REMOVAL PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN WAS NOT ABLE TO PULL BACK THE LASSO/ROBE, BECAUSE DEVICE RESISTANT TO PULL BACK MORE. THEREFORE, A POLYP WAS NOT BURNT COMPLETELY. IT WAS FURTHER NOTED THAT ONE WIRE FROM THE BRAID WAS NOTED TO BE BROKEN. THERE WAS MORE PAIN TO THE PATIENT REPORTED DUE TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8138691 ↗MalfunctionFeb 20, 2017Device Operates Differently Than Expected; Device Operates Differently Than Expected
IT WAS REPORTED BY THE USER FACILITY THAT A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE TO REMOVE POLYPS IN THE UTERINE CAVITY. THE ATTENDING PHYSICIAN ATTEMPTED TO EXTRACT POLYPS BY USING A DUCKBILL HYSTEROSCOPIC POLYP SNARE. THE TIP OF THE SNARE BROKE BUT DID NOT SEPARATE. THERE WERE NO UNINTENDED SECTIONS OF THE DEVICE THAT REMAINED INSIDE OF THE PATIENT¿S BODY, NOR DID THE PATIENT EXPERIENCE ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS DUE TO THIS OCCURRENCE. NO FURTHER INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 6343233 ↗
Other SNARE, FLEXIBLE devices
- CAPTIFLEX M00562400Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE3 recalls85 reports
- SENSATION Short Throw M00562670Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE1 recall178 reports
- SENSATION Short Throw M00562650Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE1 recall173 reports
- Ultratome XL M00535900Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE205 reports
- CAPTIVATOR M00562340Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE2 recalls71 reports
- CAPTIVATOR II M00561230Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE1 recall83 reports
- CAPTIVATOR M00562320Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE2 recalls32 reports
- CAPTIVATOR M00562300Boston Scientific Corporation · SNARE, FLEXIBLE1 recall78 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page