Skip to content

FlareHawk FHTGCT0929TTSRecalls & reported problems

Integrity Implants Inc. · Shell, Lordotic 29 mm, TiH11 Sterile · Class 2 · Implant

All models of FlareHawk (29)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00840200406697), received between Oct 30, 2024 and Oct 30, 2024 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Failure” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 1 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Failure1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionOct 30, 2024Activation Failure; Activation Failure

    ON OCT 2ND, ACCELUS WAS MADE AWARE OF AN ISSUE WITH AN IMPLANT. IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING THE SURGERY THE SURGEON WAS UNABLE TO CONFIRM IMPLANT LOCKING VIA CONTRALATERAL FLUORO. THE LOCK GAUGE DISPLAYED THE IMPLANT WAS LOCKED BUT FLUORO WAS NOT ABLE TO 100% CONFIRM THE IMPLANT WAS LOCKED. DURING A 2 LEVEL REVISION TLIF CASE ON (B)(6), DR. (B)(6) WAS THE SURGEON DOING THE SURGERY. HE HAS TO BE OBSERVED FOR HIS FIRST 5 CASES AS HE IS JUST OUT OF FELLOWSHIP. DR. (B)(6) WAS HIS OBSERVING SURGEON IN THIS CASE. DR. (B)(6) DID THE TLIF/DISC PREP EXPLAINED TO DR. (B)(6) THAT OUR IMPLANT FLAREHAWK SHOULD BE SIZED LINE TO LINE WITH THE SHAVERS INTRODUCED INTO THE DISC SPACE. I ALSO INTERJECTED AND EXPLAINED FOR PROPER SIZING AND LOCKING OF THE IMPLANT, IT'S IMPERATIVE TO NOT OVERSIZE, TO GO BY THE PADDLE SIZERS AS A HEIGHT TRIAL. DR. (B)(6) EXPLAINED HE WANTED MORE HEIGHT AND DID NOT WANT TO INTRODUCE ANOTHER SHAVER HEIGHT. DR. (B)(6) ALSO SUGGESTED THE EXPANDABLE HEIGHT TRIAL, BUT DR. (B)(6) DID NOT WANT TO USE IT. HE TOLD US HE WANTED A 12 MM, 15DEGREE LORDOTIC IMPLANT, 29MM LENGTH. TAYSSIR JOMAA (REP FOR THE SURGEONS) AND I PULLED THE APPROPRIATELY SIZED SHIM AND SHELL FROM THE FH11 STE

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20567568 ↗

Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices

All Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page