Skip to content

Transitionless Micro-Introducer Kit KIT-038-03Recalls & reported problems

Galt Medical Corp. · Transitionless Micro-Introducer Kit · Class 2

All models of Transitionless Micro-Introducer Kit (3)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841268104549), received between Nov 30, 2018 and Nov 9, 2023 — classified as 1 injury, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Break” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 1 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Break2
  • Physical Resistance/Sticking1

Patient problems

  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient2
  • Foreign Body In Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 9, 2023

    DURING AN ATTEMPT TO PLACE A MIDLINE CATHETER, THE GUIDEWIRE BECAME STUCK IN THE PATIENT'S ARM (NOTED TO BE LOCATED IN SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE). THERE WAS DIFFICULTY IN BACKING THE WIRE OUT, THEREFORE, VASCULAR SURGERY WAS CONSULTED. AS ATTEMPTS WERE BEING MADE AT WIRE REMOVAL BY VASCULAR SURGERY, THE WIRE BROKE. A MEDICAL DECISION WAS MADE TO LEAVE THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE WIRE INSIDE THE PATIENT. THIS WAS REPORTED AS THE 3RD TIME IN WHICH THIS PROCEDURALIST HAS SEEN THE WIRE TIP ENCIRCLE ITSELF INTO FORMING A SMALL KNOT. IN THE PREVIOUS 2 CASES, THE WIRE WAS SIMPLY REMOVED. IN THIS CASE, THE WIRE BECAME STUCK AND REQUIRED CONSULTATION BY VASCULAR SURGERY AND A TRIP TO THE OPERATING ROOM FOR ATTEMPTED REMOVAL OF THE WIRE. NOTE: THIS GUIDEWIRE WAS USED WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PLACE A BARD POWERMIDLINE CATHETER.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 18122243 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 17, 2018Break

    AS RECEIVED FROM HEALTH PROFESSIONAL: PATIENT WAS PREPPED/ DRAPED IN STERILE FASHION. PER CARDIOLOGIST'S NOTES: A PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE STICK WAS ACHIEVED THROUGH THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN. A GUIDEWIRE WAS THEN INSERTED INTO THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN. RESISTANCE WAS MET AND WHILE RETRACTING THE WIRE, THE TIP BROKE OFF. CONTRAST ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED DEMONSTRATING THAT THE WIRE WAS NOT INTRAVASCULAR. ACCESS WAS THEN AGAIN ACHIEVED VIA MICROPUNCTURE UNDER ANGIOGRAPHY.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8171754 ↗
  • MalfunctionNov 30, 2018Break; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    PATIENT WAS PREPPED/ DRAPED IN STERILE FASHION. PER CARDIOLOGIST'S NOTES: A PERCUTANEOUS NEEDLE STICK WAS ACHIEVED THROUGH THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN. A GUIDEWIRE WAS THEN INSERTED INTO THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN VEIN. RESISTANCE WAS MET AND WHILE RETRACTING THE WIRE, THE TIP BROKE OFF. CONTRAST ANGIOGRAPHY WAS PERFORMED DEMONSTRATING THAT THE WIRE WAS NOT INTRAVASCULAR. ACCESS WAS THEN AGAIN ACHIEVED VIA MICROPUNCTURE UNDER ANGIOGRAPHY. MANUFACTURER RESPONSE FOR PERCUTANEOUS SHEATH INTRODUCER KIT, TRANSITIONLESS MICRO-INTRODUCER KIT (PER SITE REPORTER). REPORTED BY THE CARDIAC CATH LAB MANAGER TO MANUFACTURER.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8119529 ↗

Other Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit devices

All Percutaneous Sheath Introducer Kit devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page