Skip to content

APEX CR Knee KC-1101LRecalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · CR Femoral Cemented, Size 1 Left · Class 2 · Implant

All models of APEX CR Knee (28)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690100805), received between Feb 17, 2017 and Nov 5, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 1 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Joint Laxity1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryNov 5, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON 10/21/2024. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED LOOSENING AFTER PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION THE FEMUR, INSERT AND BOLT WE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20608561 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 17, 2017Unstable

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE FIRST REVISION OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2013 AND THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2013. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY IN THE KNEE AND PATIENT PAIN. DURING THIS REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 2 TIBIAL BASEPLATE, AND SIZE 1 FEMORAL COMPONENT WERE REMOVED ALONG WITH THE SIZE 1 X 20 MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT FROM THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY. THE COMPONENTS WERE REPLACED WITH A NEW SIZE 2 TIBIAL BASEPLATE, A SIZE 1+ FEMUR, A SIZE 1 X 10 MM TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT. IN ADDITION, TWO MODULAR STEMS, FOUR FEMORAL AUGMENTS AND BOLTS, AND TWO TIBIAL AUGMENTS AND BOLTS WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 6340436 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page