Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-2205RRecalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · Primary Tibial Baseplate Cemented, size 5 Right · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101093), received between May 15, 2019 and Sep 19, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 2 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Fall2
  • Joint Laxity1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 19, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE WAS (B)(6) 2024. THE REASON FOR REVISION REPORTED IS SUBSIDED TIBIAL TRAY AFTER A REPORTED TRAMA. DURING THE REVISION A ALL IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NON-OMNI COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 20263967 ↗
  • InjurySep 3, 2024Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED ON (B)(6) 2023. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED SUBSIDING AND LOOSENING. DURING THE REVISION THE TIBIAL TRAY INSERT AND BOLTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20124789 ↗
  • InjuryMay 15, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT, RETAINING BOLT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 8612511 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page