Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-35031Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · Congruent Tibial Insert, Size 3 x 11mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101260), received between Feb 8, 2017 and Feb 10, 2021 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection2
  • Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
  • Insufficient Information1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 10, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS . THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 11311965 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 20, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9734441 ↗
  • InjuryOct 15, 2018Unstable

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 3 X 11MM CONGRUENT INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIZE 3 X 16MM ULTRA INSERT AND ANOTHER TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT.

    Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties

    MAUDE report 7965390 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 8, 2017Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2016. THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016 AND THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REVISION SURGERIES OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, ALL DEVICES WERE REMOVED. THE TIBIAL INSERT, THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE, THE FEMORAL COMPONENT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE EXPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6312648 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page