Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-35041Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · Congruent Tibial Insert, Size 4 x 11mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
10
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
10
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 10 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101314), received between Nov 29, 2017 and Jan 23, 2025 — classified as 10 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Unstable” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Unstable3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection5
  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Fall1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • No Code Available1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 10 most recent of 10 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJan 23, 2025Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 21218804 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2024Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2016. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION THE INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 20255885 ↗
  • InjuryNov 4, 2022Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2022. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 15736515 ↗
  • InjuryJul 11, 2022Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2021. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE FEMUR, INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 14980998 ↗
  • InjuryAug 20, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT, WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12348529 ↗
  • InjuryAug 18, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT, BASEPLATE, PATELLA, FEMUR WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW NON OMNI COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 12339325 ↗
  • InjuryNov 19, 2020Unstable

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2016. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT, PATELLA AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 10872830 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2018Unstable

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY DUE TO A REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 4 X 11MM CONGRUENT INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIZE 4 X 12MM CONGRUENT INSERT AND ANOTHER TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 7817827 ↗
  • InjuryJun 6, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF AN INFECTION, AS REPORTED. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI DOVETAIL INSERT LOCKING CONNECTOR AND DOVETAIL CONGRUENT INSERT, SZ 4, 11MM WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7575331 ↗
  • InjuryNov 29, 2017Unstable

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2015. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY. DURING THIS REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR THICKER COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7069158 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page