OMNI Knee KC-36024Recalls & reported problems
Omni Life Science, Inc. · Ultra Tibial Insert CS, Size 2 x 14mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of OMNI Knee (78)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 9
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101550), received between Feb 10, 2017 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information3
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
- Loose or Intermittent Connection1
- Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
- Naturally Worn1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Fall2
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Laxity1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
- No Code Available1
- No Information1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
- Patient Problem/Medical Problem1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJul 22, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION THE INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO CORIN'S CLINICAL DEPARTMENT ON (B)(6) 2025 UNDER CASE STUDY (B)(6).
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 22563941 ↗InjuryAug 9, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2021. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 15191890 ↗InjuryDec 22, 2021Naturally Worn
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2009. THE REASON FOR REVISION POLY WEAR. DURING THE REVISION A POLY SWAP OCCURRED REPLACING THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 13062058 ↗InjuryDec 14, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL AND SUBSEQUENT LOOSE KNEE. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT, PATELLA BUTTON AND BOLT WERE REMOVED. THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS REPLACED WITH A THICKER SIZE.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 13003635 ↗InjuryDec 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2014, THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF A LARGER SIZE.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9403790 ↗InjurySep 6, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED POOR RANGE OF MOTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO SMALLER SIZE.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8972435 ↗InjuryMay 29, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 8651742 ↗InjuryOct 18, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE, FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW REVISION COMPONENTS. IN ADDITION, A FEMORAL STEM, SEVERAL FEMORAL AUGMENTS AND AUGMENT BOLTS, A TIBIAL STEM, TIBIAL AUGMENTS AND AUGMENT BOLTS, AND A PATELLA WERE IMPLANTED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7980113 ↗InjuryFeb 10, 2017Unstable
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2012. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY IN THE KNEE. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 2 X 14 MM TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO A SIZE 2 X 18 MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT.
Patient problems: No Information
MAUDE report 6323488 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page