Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-36024Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · Ultra Tibial Insert CS, Size 2 x 14mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
9
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
9
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101550), received between Feb 10, 2017 and Jul 22, 2025 — classified as 9 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loose or Intermittent Connection1
  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth1
  • Naturally Worn1
  • Unstable1

Patient problems

  • Fall2
  • Insufficient Information1
  • Joint Laxity1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Patient Problem/Medical Problem1

Recent adverse event reports

The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 22, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION THE INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS. THIS EVENT WAS REPORTED TO CORIN'S CLINICAL DEPARTMENT ON (B)(6) 2025 UNDER CASE STUDY (B)(6).

    Patient problems: Joint Laxity

    MAUDE report 22563941 ↗
  • InjuryAug 9, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2021. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 15191890 ↗
  • InjuryDec 22, 2021Naturally Worn

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2009. THE REASON FOR REVISION POLY WEAR. DURING THE REVISION A POLY SWAP OCCURRED REPLACING THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT.

    Patient problems: Insufficient Information

    MAUDE report 13062058 ↗
  • InjuryDec 14, 2021Loose or Intermittent Connection; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL AND SUBSEQUENT LOOSE KNEE. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT, PATELLA BUTTON AND BOLT WERE REMOVED. THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS REPLACED WITH A THICKER SIZE.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 13003635 ↗
  • InjuryDec 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2014, THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF A LARGER SIZE.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9403790 ↗
  • InjurySep 6, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED POOR RANGE OF MOTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO SMALLER SIZE.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Patient Problem/Medical Problem

    MAUDE report 8972435 ↗
  • InjuryMay 29, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8651742 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL BASEPLATE, FEMORAL COMPONENT, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW REVISION COMPONENTS. IN ADDITION, A FEMORAL STEM, SEVERAL FEMORAL AUGMENTS AND AUGMENT BOLTS, A TIBIAL STEM, TIBIAL AUGMENTS AND AUGMENT BOLTS, AND A PATELLA WERE IMPLANTED.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7980113 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2017Unstable

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2012. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INSTABILITY IN THE KNEE. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 2 X 14 MM TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO A SIZE 2 X 18 MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 6323488 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page