OMNI Knee KC-36032Recalls & reported problems
Omni Life Science, Inc. · Ultra Tibial Insert CS, Size 3 x 12mm · Class 2 · Implant
All models of OMNI Knee (78)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 16
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 16
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 16 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101611), received between Sep 12, 2017 and Aug 25, 2022 — classified as 16 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (5 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available5
- Insufficient Device Problem Information5
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Patient Device Interaction Problem1
- Unstable1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection8
- Pain2
- Fall1
- Insufficient Information1
- Joint Laxity1
- Loss of Range of Motion1
- No Code Available1
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 16 most recent of 16 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryAug 25, 2022Patient Device Interaction Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Joint Laxity
MAUDE report 15298818 ↗InjuryFeb 18, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2022. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2022. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS POSSIBLE INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT, WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 13561086 ↗InjuryMay 14, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, SURGEON REMOVED ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT AND REPLACED THEM WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 11824547 ↗InjuryApr 5, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS SUSPECTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11616993 ↗InjuryJan 31, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS SUSPECTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, ALL COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A TEMPORARY ANTIBIOTIC SPACER.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11256416 ↗InjuryDec 10, 2020Unstable
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Insufficient Information
MAUDE report 10988925 ↗InjuryOct 27, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION SURGERY, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REVISED TO NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Fall
MAUDE report 10740396 ↗InjuryMar 18, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2011. DURING THE REVISION A POLY SWAP OCCURRED REPLACING THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT.
Patient problems: No Code Available
MAUDE report 9850176 ↗InjuryDec 10, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 9445134 ↗InjuryJun 11, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED FOR POOR RANGE OF MOTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED FOR SMALLER COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Patient Problem/Medical Problem
MAUDE report 8687927 ↗InjuryMar 8, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2011. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, THE POLY PATELLA AND TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8403268 ↗InjuryMar 1, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A POSSIBLE INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 3 X 12MM TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8382674 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2014. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 3 X 12MM ULTRA INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIZE 3 X 14MM ULTRA INSERT AND A NEW TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT OF THE SAME SIZE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7965391 ↗InjurySep 28, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017 AND THE FIRST REVISION IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT IMPLANTED DURING THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS ALONG WITH THE FEMORAL COMPONENT FROM THE ORIGINAL SURGERY.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7920104 ↗InjuryOct 17, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 3 X 12MM TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO NEW IMPLANTS OF THE SAME SIZE.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6955523 ↗InjurySep 12, 2017Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 6857716 ↗
Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices
- ATTUNE 1506-00-005Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER589 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-004Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER580 reports
- JOURNEY 74012812Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER502 reports
- JOURNEY 74011856Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER438 reports
- PERSONA™ 42-5099-094-00Zimmer, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER406 reports
- JOURNEY 74011857Smith & Nephew, Inc. · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER388 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-007Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER288 reports
- ATTUNE 1506-00-003Depuy (Ireland) · PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER271 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page