Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-36046Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · Ultra Tibial Insert CS, Size 4 x 16mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101703), received between Aug 27, 2018 and Dec 15, 2020 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2

Patient problems

  • Fall1
  • No Code Available1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 15, 2020Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 11009389 ↗
  • InjuryJan 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATE OF (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED LAXITY. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 9582524 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8313150 ↗
  • InjuryAug 27, 2018Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2014. THE REPORTED REASON FOR THIS REVISION SURGERY IS UNKNOWN. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 4 X 16MM ULTRA INSERT AND TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 7817841 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page