Skip to content

OMNI Knee KC-40388Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · All Poly 3 Peg Patella 38 mm x 8 mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Knee (78)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690101994), received between Dec 17, 2018 and Dec 22, 2025 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Aseptic loosening2
  • No Information1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Pain1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 22, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED LOOSENING. DURING THE REVISION THE PETALLA, INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 23862588 ↗
  • InjuryAug 13, 2025Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth; Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2024. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED LOOSENING. DURING THE REVISION THE PATELLA BUTTON WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW IMPLANT.

    Patient problems: Aseptic loosening

    MAUDE report 22793611 ↗
  • InjuryJun 11, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR PATIENT WAS REVISED FOR PATELLAFEMORAL PAIN ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS UNKNOWN. THE PATELLA WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED THEM WITH NEW COMPONENT.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 11983538 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED LOOSENING. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL PATELLA, TIBIAL INSERT, AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8759333 ↗
  • InjuryDec 17, 2018Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF REPORTED DISLOCATED PATELLA. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI PATELLA, TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: No Information

    MAUDE report 8171585 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page