Skip to content

APEX PS Knee KP-20410Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · PS Insert, Size 4 x 10mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of APEX PS Knee (63)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
12
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
12
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690113218), received between May 31, 2017 and Oct 24, 2025 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (8 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information8
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available2

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection9
  • Fall1
  • Loss of Range of Motion1
  • Scar Tissue1

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 24, 2025Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available; Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2025. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE (B)(6) 2021. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION THE FEMUR, TIBIAL TRAY, PATELLA, TIBIAL INSERT AND BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 23377884 ↗
  • InjuryApr 17, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS SUSPECTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT, PATELLA, FEMORAL COMPONENT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 11683169 ↗
  • InjuryOct 22, 2020Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS UNKNOWN. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10723357 ↗
  • InjurySep 29, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED POOR RANGE OF MOTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion

    MAUDE report 10604100 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 26, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9758987 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 10, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY OCCURED ON (B)(6) 2018, THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT SCAR TISSUE. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Scar Tissue

    MAUDE report 9689203 ↗
  • InjuryNov 13, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9318630 ↗
  • InjuryNov 11, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9306856 ↗
  • InjuryJun 24, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8726265 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 25, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 8366359 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 6, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND EXCHANGED FOR NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 8313152 ↗
  • InjuryMay 31, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2015. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 4 X 10MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6602308 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page