Skip to content

APEX PS Knee KP-22310Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · PS-C Insert, Size 3 x 10mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of APEX PS Knee (63)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690113560), received between Oct 18, 2018 and Apr 10, 2024 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • Insufficient Device Problem Information1

Patient problems

  • Bacterial Infection1
  • Pain1
  • Rupture1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryApr 10, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A BI LATERAL KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2024. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION THE TIBIAL INSERTS AND RETAINING BOLTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW IMPLANTS.

    Patient problems: Bacterial Infection

    MAUDE report 19080764 ↗
  • InjuryMay 1, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 8570260 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE REPORTEDLY, THE PATIENT HAD RUPTURED A QUADRICEP TENDON. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 3 X 10MM PS-C INSERT AND 10MM TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A SIZE 3 X 12MM PS-C INSERT AND A 12MM TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT.

    Patient problems: Rupture

    MAUDE report 7978552 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page