Skip to content

APEX PS Knee KP-22414Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · PS-C Insert, Size 4 x 14mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of APEX PS Knee (63)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690113669), received between Apr 10, 2017 and Feb 5, 2020 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Patient-Device Incompatibility1

Patient problems

  • Bone Fracture(s)1
  • Fall1
  • Pain1
  • Unspecified Infection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryFeb 5, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS UNKNOWN, THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATELLAR FRACTURE. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 9672327 ↗
  • InjuryJan 24, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 9629794 ↗
  • InjuryOct 18, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF A REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI SIZE 4 X 14MM PS-C INSERT, 14MM PS-C TIBIAL BASEPLATE RETAINING BOLT, AND 32MM X 10MM PATELLA DOME WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 7978544 ↗
  • InjuryApr 10, 2017Patient-Device Incompatibility

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2015. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF ANTERIOR KNEE PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL SIZE 4 X 14MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Pain

    MAUDE report 6477003 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page