Skip to content

APEX Revision Knee KP-24216Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · PS-R Insert, Size 2 x 16mm · Class 2 · Implant

All models of APEX Revision Knee (22)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690113980), received between Apr 21, 2017 and Oct 13, 2020 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (3 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information3
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1

Patient problems

  • Unspecified Infection3
  • Fall1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryOct 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6)2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS POSSIBLE INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 10673018 ↗
  • InjuryApr 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY DATE IS (B)(6) 2020. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE TIBIAL INSERT WAS REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 9953675 ↗
  • InjuryFeb 13, 2020Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2020. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED PATIENT FALL. DURING THE REVISION THE ORIGINAL TIBIAL INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 9708182 ↗
  • InjuryApr 21, 2017Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A SECOND KNEE REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE FIRST REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2017 AND THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2016. THIS REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE SIZE 2 X 16MM INSERT AND RETAINING BOLT WERE REVISED TO NEW COMPONENTS OF THE SAME SIZE.

    Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

    MAUDE report 6510791 ↗

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLO/FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, UNCEMENTED, POROUS, COATED, POLYMER/METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page