OMNI Interface Acetabular System H5-44840Recalls & reported problems
Omni Life Science, Inc. · ApeX-LNK Acetabular Insert, UHMWPE 0 degree Hood, E Insert/40mm ID · Class 2 · Implant
All models of OMNI Interface Acetabular System (22)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 7
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690119906), received between Dec 20, 2017 and Mar 11, 2021 — classified as 7 injuries.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (4 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Insufficient Device Problem Information4
- Contamination2
- Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection4
- Pain2
- Joint Dislocation1
- Joint Disorder1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryMar 11, 2021Appropriate Device Problem Term/Code Not Available
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2021. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY OCCURRED ON (B)(6) 2021. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL ACETABULAR INSERT AND FEMORAL HEAD WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 11468145 ↗InjurySep 11, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, ALL ORIGINAL OMNI COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW NON-OMNI DEVICES
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 8999604 ↗InjuryJul 22, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY OCCURED ON (B)(6) 2012. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, THE ACETABULAR INSERT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8813656 ↗InjuryJul 16, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED DISLOCATION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL COCR FEMORAL HEAD, ACETABULAR INSERT AND SHELL WERE ALL REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW PRODUCT.
Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Disorder
MAUDE report 8795035 ↗InjuryApr 11, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REASON FOR REVISION WAS REPORTED PATIENT PAIN. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL ACETABULAR INSERT WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NEW ACETABULAR INSERT.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 8503689 ↗InjuryOct 15, 2018Contamination
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURED BECAUSE OF REPORTED PATIENT INFECTION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ACETABULAR INSERT AND FEMORAL COCR HEAD WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NEW COMPONENTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7965389 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2017Contamination
THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF INFECTION. DURING THIS REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI IMPLANTS WERE REMOVED FOR TREATMENT OF WOUND.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 7135372 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page