Skip to content

OMNI Interface Acetabular System H5-54436Recalls & reported problems

Omni Life Science, Inc. · ApeX-LNK Acetabular Insert, UHMWPE 10 degree Hood, D Insert/36mm ID · Class 2 · Implant

All models of OMNI Interface Acetabular System (22)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00841690120018), received between Jul 3, 2017 and Dec 3, 2019 — classified as 3 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Insufficient Device Problem Information” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Insufficient Device Problem Information2
  • Device Dislodged or Dislocated1

Patient problems

  • Fall1
  • Joint Dislocation1
  • Joint Disorder1
  • No Code Available1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 3, 2019Insufficient Device Problem Information; Insufficient Device Problem Information

    A COMPLAINT WAS INITIATED FOR A PATIENT WH UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2019. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2019. THE REASON FOR REVISION IS REPORTED DISLOCATION. DURING THE REVISION, ALL OMNI COMPONENTS WERE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH NON-OMNI DEVICES.

    Patient problems: Joint Dislocation; Joint Disorder

    MAUDE report 9403800 ↗
  • InjurySep 21, 2018Insufficient Device Problem Information

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2018. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2018. IT IS UNKNOWN WHY THE REVISION SURGERY OCCRED. DURING THE REVISION, THE OMNI LINER WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A NON-OMNI LINER.

    Patient problems: No Code Available

    MAUDE report 7898977 ↗
  • InjuryJul 3, 2017Device Dislodged or Dislocated

    THE COMPLAINT INVOLVED A PATIENT WHO UNDERWENT A HIP REVISION SURGERY ON (B)(6) 2017. THE ORIGINAL SURGERY IS DATED (B)(6) 2017. THE REVISION SURGERY OCCURRED BECAUSE OF POSSIBLE PATIENT FALL AND CUP DISLODGE INTO PROTRUSION. DURING THE REVISION, THE ORIGINAL OMNI ACETABULAR CUP, ACETABULAR INSERT, FEMORAL COMPONENT, FEMORAL HEAD, AND FEMORAL NECK WERE EXPLANTED. A NON-OMNI ACETABULAR CUP AND LINER WERE IMPLANTED, AND THE ORIGINAL SIZE 6 FEMORAL STEM WAS REPLACED WITH A SIZE 7 FEMORAL STEM, THE LONG NECK WAS REPLACED WITH A MEDIUM MODULAR NECK, AND THE 38MM X 0MM FEMORAL HEAD WAS REPLACED WITH A 40MM X +0MM HEAD.

    Patient problems: Fall

    MAUDE report 6684447 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page