Skip to content

Depth Electrode RD16R-SP03X-000Recalls & reported problems

Ad-Tech Medical Instrument Corporation · Class 2

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00841823109026), received between Jan 31, 2025 and Jan 31, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Fragmentation” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 1 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Fragmentation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionJan 31, 2025Material Fragmentation; Material Fragmentation

    PATIENT HAD SEEG SURGERY ON THURSDAY (B)(6) 2025. AFTER EXPLANTING ELECTRODES IN THE OR SURGICALLY THE PATIENT WAS SENT FOR A CT SCAN (ROUTINE PROCEDURE FOR THE HOSPITAL).. THERE WERE NO ISSUES DURING REMOVAL OF THE ELECTRODES, THEY WERE EXPLANTED WITHOUT INCIDENT. THE SCAN REVEALED THAT A METAL FRAGMENT REMAINED IN THE BRAIN. SCANS PRIOR TO IMPLANT DID NOT SHOW THAT THE METAL FRAGMENT EXISTED SO IT WAS ASSUMED THAT THIS WAS PART OF THE ELECTRODE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21282549 ↗

Other ELECTRODE, DEPTH devices

All ELECTRODE, DEPTH devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page