Skip to content

MiniONE Balloon Button M1-5-1410-IRecalls & reported problems

Applied Medical Technology, Inc. · 14FR x 1.0cm MiniONE Balloon Button - Low Profile Feeding Device (ENFit), MDR · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00842071140779), received between Aug 8, 2025 and Aug 8, 2025 — classified as 1 malfunction.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • No Apparent Adverse Event1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 8, 2025No Apparent Adverse Event; No Apparent Adverse Event

    PER THE ORIGINAL REPORTER IN UF REPORT #: (B)(4), IT WAS REPORTED THAT, "CALLED TO BEDSIDE BY RN BECAUSE SHE NOTED INCREASED SPACE BETWEEN SKIN AND BASE OF G-TUBE, AND EASE OF MOVEMENT WITH DRESSING CARES. CALLED SURGICAL APP [ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDER] ON CALL. SHE RECOMMENDED OBTAINING DYE STUDY AND MAKING INFANT NPO IF ANY CONCERNS WITH G-TUBE, SAID SHE WOULD COME UP BUT ALSO THAT SHE WAS MANAGING TRAUMA AND WOULD LIKELY SEE IN AM. WE OBTAINED DYE STUDY, NORMAL WITHIN TRACT. BEDSIDE RN, CHARGE RN, MD AND MYSELF (APP) CHECKED IF THERE WAS ANY FLUID WITHIN G-TUBE BALLOON, MET RESISTANCE AND WERE UNABLE TO PULL ANYTHING OFF BALLOON. CHECKED OR [OPERATING ROOM] REPORT, INITIALLY HAD 4CC OF WATER IN BALLOON. RE-INSTILLED 0.5CC OF WATER BEFORE MEETING RESISTANCE. VERY LIKELY BASED ON EXAM THAT BALLOON HAD BEEN RUPTURED AND THIS IS WHY THERE WAS INCREASED MOVEMENT IN G-TUBE, DESPITE MAINTAINED WITHIN TRACT. I CALLED SURGICAL APP AND MADE AWARE OF FINDINGS REGARDING BALLOON, NORMAL DYE STUDY AND MAKING INFANT NPO [NIL PER OS]. SHE SAID THEY WOULD SEE INFANT IN AM. G-TUBE REPLACED FINALLY ON [DATE REDACTED] AND SURGICAL TEAM NOTED G-TUBE BALLOON HAD BEEN RUPTURED. PER PREVIOUS PATIENTS,

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22752517 ↗

Other Tubes, Gastrointestinal (And Accessories) devices

All Tubes, Gastrointestinal (And Accessories) devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page