Skip to content

Stent FREDX2513-PMARecalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · FRED-X 21 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Stent (63)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
3
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842429114216), received between Jul 25, 2022 and Dec 19, 2023 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “No Flow” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 2 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem2
  • No Flow1

Patient problems

  • Thrombosis/Thrombus2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1

Recent adverse event reports

The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT A PATIENT WAS BROUGHT THE ANGIO SUITE FOR SCHEDULED TREATMENT OF THE MCA VASCULATURE WITH A FLOW DIVERTER. ACCESS WAS GAINED AND DEVICE WAS SELECTED, THE SEGMENT TO BE TREATED WAS THE MCA VESSEL, THE DOCTOR SUCCESSFULLY IMPLANTED A 2.5X13/ 8 FLOW DIVERTER IN THE VESSEL, AFTER CAREFUL MEASUREMENTS OF THE VESSEL 2.4MM DISTAL-2.6MM PROXIMAL THE 13/8 WAS SELECTED TO FIT IN BETWEEN THE VESSEL PERFORATORS. THE PHYSICIAN DID NOT WANT TO COVER THOSE VESSELS WITH THE FLOW DIVERTER. THIS WAS A STRAIGHT SEGMENT OF THE VESSEL, NO CALCIFICATION WAS MENTIONED, IMPLANT WAS DELIVERED WITHOUT DIFFICULTY, FINAL ANGIOGRAPHIC VIEWS AND IMAGES WERE TAKES AS PER PROTOCOL AND THE DOCTOR WAS SATISFIED WITH THE PATIENT OUTCOME. APPROXIMATELY, TWENTY MINUTES FOLLOWING IMPLANTATION, THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE ANGIO SUITE TO PERFORM A THROMBECTOMY. PROCEDURE COMPLETED AND THE DOCTOR ADDED A 2B3A MEDICATION (EPTIFIBATIDE-INTEGRILIN) VIA AN IV DRIP TO HELP WITH THROMBOSIS. WAS ALERTED 2 HOURS LATER THAT THE PATIENT RETURNED FOR SECOND THROMBECTOMY. PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE NEURO ICU.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 18361432 ↗
  • InjuryDec 18, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED A FLOW DIVERTER IN AN UNRUPTURED ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT RETURNED TO THE ANGIO SUITE TO PERFORM A THROMBECTOMY THREE DAYS AFTER IMPLANT PROCEDURE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED, AND PHYSICIAN ADDED A 2B3A MEDICATION (EPTIFIBATIDE-INTEGRILIN) VIA AN IV DRIP TO HELP WITH THROMBOSIS. PATIENT WAS TAKEN TO THE NEURO ICU AND DISCHARGED SEVERAL DAYS LATER.

    Patient problems: Thrombosis/Thrombus

    MAUDE report 18352766 ↗
  • MalfunctionJul 25, 2022No Flow; No Flow

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT UPON A SIX MONTH FOLLOW-UP ANGIOGRAM POST DEPLOYMENT OF A FLOW DIVERTER, THE DEVICE WAS COMPLETELY OCCLUDED. THE PATIENT IS ASYMPTOMATIC AND THE VESSEL IS BACKFILLING FROM COLLATERALS WITH COMPLETE OBLITERATION OF ANEURYSM. THE PATIENT IS NEUROLOGICALLY INTACT. NO INTERVENTION WILL BE PERFORMED. THE PATIENT INITIALLY PRESENTED WITH A M3 DISSECTING ANEURYSM.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15100048 ↗

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page