Skip to content

Stent FREDX5026-PMARecalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · FRED-X 27 · Class 3 · Implant

All models of Stent (63)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
1
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842429114469), received between May 19, 2022 and Aug 27, 2025 — classified as 1 death, 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Activation Problem” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 1 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Activation Problem2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Material Twisted/Bent1
  • Stretched1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
  • Intracranial Hemorrhage1
  • Stroke/CVA1

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionAug 27, 2025Material Twisted/Bent; Material Twisted/Bent

    AS REPORTED THROUGH FREDX PAS CLINICAL STUDY: PER CORELAB IMAGE READ OF THE 6-MONTH FU IMAGING PERFORMED ON (B)(6) 2024, "PROXIMAL FORESHORTENING" OF THE FREDX STENT WAS REPORTED. NO REPORT OF INJURY TO THE PATIENT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22909153 ↗
  • InjuryNov 16, 2022Stretched; Activation Problem; Stretched; Activation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE FRED STENT WAS USED TO TREAT A 4.3MM DISTAL X 5.0MM PROXIMAL LEFT INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY (ICA) ANEURYSM. THE STENT WAS IMPLANTED WITH PROXIMAL END TWISTED. THE PHYSICIAN IMPLANTED A NON-MICROVENTION STENT IN THE CLOSED SEGMENT FOLLOWED BY BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY TO ENSURE OPEN INNER LUMEN. PATIENT WAS STABLE DURING ENTIRE PROCEDURE AND WAS DOING WELL POST PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 15810726 ↗
  • DeathSep 23, 2022Activation Problem; Activation Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING AN ICA ANEURYSM TREATMENT, THE FREDX DISTAL PORTION WAS PLACED AT ICA TERMINUS AND WAS OPENED AT THE OPPOSED VESSEL WALL, BUT THE PROXIMAL PORTION DID NOT OPEN FULLY PAST A CURVE IN THE PATIENT'S NEUROVASCULAR ANATOMY. THE PHYSICIAN RE-SHEATHED AND RE-DEPLOYED THE FREDX MULTIPLE TIMES TO TRY TO OPEN THE PROXIMAL END FULLY. AFTER COMPLETE DEPLOYMENT, THE PHYSICIAN MADE SEVERAL ATTEMPTS TO OPEN THE PROXIMAL END BY USING A MICROCATHETER AND GUIDEWIRE, BUT HE WAS UNABLE TO GAIN ACCESS TO THE FREDX. THE PHYSICIAN THEN CHOSE TO ENTER THE CONTRALATERAL VASCULATURE THROUGH THE ACOM TO ACCESS THE FREDX WITH A SL-10 MICROCATHETER, AND HE WAS ABLE TO OPEN THE PROXIMAL PORTION OF THE FREDX WITH AMPLE WALL APPOSITION. THE PHYSICIAN DID A FINAL RUN OF THE PROCEDURE AND DID NOT NOTICE ANYTHING. AT SOME POINT, THE PATIENT WAS BROUGHT BACK TO THE ANGIOSUITE AND THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED A VESSEL BLEED ON THE CONTRALATERAL VASCULATURE THAT WAS NOT NOTICED DURING THE FINAL RUN OF THE PROCEDURE. THE PATIENT PASSED AWAY DUE TO BLEEDING ON THE CONTRALATERAL SIDE IN THE ACOM/A1 REGION. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE VESSEL BLEED WAS DUE TO THE PHYSICIAN'S MANEUVER ACCESSING THE DISTAL P

    Patient problems: Intracranial Hemorrhage

    MAUDE report 15471992 ↗
  • InjuryMay 19, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT ONE DAY POST PLACEMENT OF A FRED X STENT, THE PATIENT WAS RE-ADMITTED WITH A LEFT HEMISPHERIC STROKE. THERE WERE NO COMPLICATIONS DURING THE PLACEMENT OF THE FRED X STENT IN THE LEFT ICA. THE VESSEL'S PROXIMAL SIZE WAS APPROXIMATELY 4.5 MM. THE VESSEL'S DISTAL SIZE WAS APPROXIMATELY 3.83 MM. ONE DAY POST PROCEDURE, HOWEVER, THE PATIENT HAD A LARGE OPHTHALMIC SEGMENT ANEURYSM AND WAS RE-ADMITTED WITH A LEFT HEMISPHERIC STROKE. A CLOT WAS NOTICED ON THE DISTAL PORTION OF THE FRED X DEVICE. IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT WAS NON-COMPLIANT WITH POST-PROCEDURE TREATMENT PROTOCOL.

    Patient problems: Stroke/CVA

    MAUDE report 14436984 ↗

Other Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices

All Intracranial aneurysm flow diverter devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page