Skip to content

SCEPTER BC0420C-ID-700-ALRecalls & reported problems

Microvention, Inc. · Scepter C · Class 2

All models of SCEPTER (4)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
0
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00842429117569), received between Mar 15, 2025 and Nov 25, 2025 — classified as 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Rupture” (2 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 1 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 1 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Material Rupture2
  • Material Deformation1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionNov 25, 2025Material Rupture; Material Rupture

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PHYSICIAN WAS TREATING AN ICA ANEURYSM ON THE RIGHT. A COIL EMBOLIZATION IN REMODELING TECHNIQUE WAS PLANNED. AS THE BALLOON FOR REMODELING A SCEPTER C 4-20 WAS CHOSEN. THE BALLOON WAS PREPARED WITHOUT ANY ISSUE. DURING THE THIRD INFLATION (INSIDE THE PATIENT), THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED A SUDDEN DEFLATION AND CONTRAST MEDIA RINSING FROM THE DISTAL TIP OF THE SCEPTER C. THE BALLOON WAS COMPLETELY DEFLATED AND REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT BODY. WHEN THE PHYSICIAN CHECKED THE BALLOON, THEY FOUND A LEAKAGE. THE SCEPTER C WAS EXCHANGED AND THE EXAMINATION CONTINUED WITH GOOD RESULT. THE PATIENT IS DOING WELL. NO INJURY CAUSED BY THIS ISSUE. THERE WAS NO INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23652914 ↗
  • MalfunctionMar 15, 2025Material Rupture; Material Deformation; Material Rupture; Material Deformation

    IT WAS REPORT THAT THE BALLOON WAS PREPARED OUTSIDE OF THE PATIENT SUCCESSFULLY. WHEN ATTEMPTING ANEURYSM COIL REMODELING AT CAROTID/OPHTHALMIC, IT ONLY INFLATED PROXIMALLY RATHER THAN ACROSS THE WHOLE LENGTH OF THE BALLOON. THE BALLOON SHAPING WAS IRREGULAR WHEN INFLATED FOR THE THIRD TIME AT THE LEVEL OF THE ANEURYSM NECK, AND IT THEN BURST. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH ANOTHER BALLOON WITH NO ISSUES, AND THE COILING WAS COMPLETED. THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY REPORTED. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED FROM THE HOSPITAL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 21613842 ↗

Other Catheter, intravascular occluding, temporary devices

All Catheter, intravascular occluding, temporary devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page