Reliance Cervical IBF-S System 2-S40-DV14Recalls & reported problems
Vy Spine LLC · Cervical IBF-S, Screw, Drilling Variable, 4.0, 14mm · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00842566102107), received between Oct 22, 2018 and Oct 22, 2018 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Migration1
Patient problems
- Dysphasia1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionOct 22, 2018Migration; Migration
CERVICAL IBF-S, SCREW, DRILLING VARIABLE, 4.0, 14MM IS PART OF THE RELIANCE CERVICAL IBF-S SYSTEM. RELIANCE MEDICAL SYSTEMS (RMS) WAS MADE AWARE OF THE COMPLAINT WEDNESDAY, (B)(6) 2018 VIA PHONE CALL TO RMS ACCOUNT MANAGER (B)(4) FROM FIELD REP. (B)(4). IMPLANTATION OF THE DEVICE WAS PERFORMED (B)(6) 2018 BY DR. (B)(46 AT (B)(6). PATIENT WENT TO THREE MONTH CHECK UP WITH DR. (B)(6), WHILE THERE THE PATIENT REPORTED TO THE PHYSICIAN THAT HE WAS EXPERIENCING DYSPHASIA. X-RAYS WERE TAKEN AND IT WAS DISCOVERED ONE OF THE SCREWS HAD BEGUN TO BACK OUT. REVISION PROCEDURE WAS PERFORMED (B)(6) 2018 BY DR. (B)(6) TO REMOVE THE SCREW THAT HAD BEGUN TO BACK OUT. ENGINEERING MANAGER (B)(4) AT RMS DISCUSSED THE REVISION PROCEDURE WITH DR. (B)(6). (B)(4) STATED, "THE SURGEON SAID THAT, ALTHOUGH THE ABUNDANCE OF TISSUE GROWTH AROUND THE IMPLANT LIMITED HIS VIEW, HE DID NOT NOTICE ANY DISCERNIBLE BREAKAGE OF THE IBF PEEK IMPLANT. HE FELT THE FUSION AROUND THE IMPLANT WAS MATURE ENOUGH TO RETAIN THE PEEK IMPLANT WITHOUT FURTHER REINFORCEMENT VIA BONE SCREWS. THEREFORE, ONLY THE SCREW THAT BACKED OUT OF THE IMPLANT WAS REMOVED."
Patient problems: Dysphasia
MAUDE report 7993258 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical devices
- ROI-C MC1005TLDR Spine Usa, Inc. · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical54 reports
- EIT CIF cage CUI8070SEIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical1 recall4 reports
- EIT CIF cage CUI8060LEIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Cervical1 recall1 report
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-7212SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-8015SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-7206SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI Ti 37-8007SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
- CONSTRUX - MINI PTC 37-4211SPOrthofix US LLC · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, cervical1 recall0 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page