RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-M4-34-145-34URecalls & reported problems
Bolton Medical Inc. · Endovascular Stent-Graft System · Class 3 · Implant
All models of RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System (127)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
1 open recall names this device. See the recall details and contact the manufacturer or your healthcare provider.
- Adverse event reports
- 3
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 2
- Recalls naming it
- 1
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 3 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00843576149786), received between Oct 2, 2024 and Dec 20, 2024 — classified as 2 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Endoleak” (2 reports).
1 FDA recall record name this device's identifier, 1 still open.
2 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (P200045); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Recalls naming this device
- Dec 20, 2022Class IIOpen, Classified
The product may be shorter than packaging indicates
Z-0997-2023 · Root cause: Labeling Change Control · Recall details · FDA record ↗
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device Endoleak2
- Difficult or Delayed Separation1
- Difficult to Advance1
Patient problems
- Clinical Endoleak2
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
Recent adverse event reports
The 3 most recent of 3 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryDec 20, 2024Device Endoleak; Device Endoleak
"ENDOLEAK (MINOR TYPE IA ENDOLEAK REMAINED): ONLY 2-DEBRANCHING WAS PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 15, AND TEVAR WAS THEN PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 22. AS THE ACCESS ARTERY COULD NOT BE PUNCTURED DUE TO ITS POOR CONDITION, A CUT-DOWN METHOD WAS USED INSTEAD. TEVAR WAS THEN PERFORMED AS USUAL. AS A 200 MM LONG STENT-GRAFT WOULD BE TOO LONG, TWO 150 MM LONG STENT-GRAFTS WERE USED. THE STENT-GRAFT CONCERNED (28-M4-34-145-34U, LOT#2406220121) WAS FIRST IMPLANTED FROM RIGHT UNDER ZONE 1, AND THE SECOND STENT-GRAFT (28-M4-34-145-34U, LOT#2407190457) WAS THEN IMPLANTED RIGHT ABOVE A DESCENDING THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM ON THE DISTAL SIDE. THE FINAL ANGIOGRAPHY REVEALED A TYPE IA ENDOLEAK. AFTER CAREFUL POST DILATATION, ANOTHER ANGIOGRAPHY CONFIRMED THAT A SLIGHT TYPE IA ENDOLEAK REMAINED. SINCE THE DESCENDING THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM ON THE DISTAL SIDE IS GOING TO BE TREATED IN THE NEAR FUTURE, THIS PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT WAS TO BE FOLLOWED UP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED ON NOVEMBER 27: CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT CONFIRMED ON NOVEMBER 26 THAT THE ENDOLEAK HAD DISAPPEARED OPERATION TYPE: 2-DEBRANCHING TEVAR BLOOD LOSS: UNKNOWN. NO IMAGE AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY. PRE-CASE PLAN AVA
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 20989450 ↗InjuryDec 20, 2024Device Endoleak; Device Endoleak
"ENDOLEAK (MINOR TYPE IA ENDOLEAK REMAINED): ONLY 2-DEBRANCHING WAS PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 15, AND TEVAR WAS THEN PERFORMED ON NOVEMBER 22. AS THE ACCESS ARTERY COULD NOT BE PUNCTURED DUE TO ITS POOR CONDITION, A CUT-DOWN METHOD WAS USED INSTEAD. TEVAR WAS THEN PERFORMED AS USUAL. AS A 200 MM LONG STENT-GRAFT WOULD BE TOO LONG, TWO 150 MM LONG STENT-GRAFTS WERE USED. THE STENT-GRAFT CONCERNED (28-M4-34-145-34U, LOT#2406220121) WAS FIRST IMPLANTED FROM RIGHT UNDER ZONE 1, AND THE SECOND STENT-GRAFT (28-M4-34-145-34U, LOT#2407190457) WAS THEN IMPLANTED RIGHT ABOVE A DESCENDING THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM ON THE DISTAL SIDE. THE FINAL ANGIOGRAPHY REVEALED A TYPE IA ENDOLEAK. AFTER CAREFUL POST DILATATION, ANOTHER ANGIOGRAPHY CONFIRMED THAT A SLIGHT TYPE IA ENDOLEAK REMAINED. SINCE THE DESCENDING THORACIC AORTIC ANEURYSM ON THE DISTAL SIDE IS GOING TO BE TREATED IN THE NEAR FUTURE, THIS PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT WAS TO BE FOLLOWED UP. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION OBTAINED ON NOVEMBER 27: CONTRAST-ENHANCED CT CONFIRMED ON NOVEMBER 26 THAT THE ENDOLEAK HAD DISAPPEARED OPERATION TYPE: 2-DEBRANCHING TEVAR. BLOOD LOSS: UNKNOWN. NO IMAGE AVAILABLE DUE TO HOSPITAL POLICY. PRE-CASE PLAN AV
Patient problems: Clinical Endoleak
MAUDE report 20989433 ↗MalfunctionOct 2, 2024Difficult to Advance; Difficult or Delayed Separation; Difficult to Advance; Difficult or Delayed Separation
"UNABLE TO ADVANCE THE INNER SHEATH: WHEN THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE ENTERED THE OPERATION ROOM, THE PHYSICIAN HAD ADVANCED THE DELIVERY SYSTEM TO THE LEFT SUBCLAVIAN ARTERY AND WAS ATTEMPTING TO DEPLOY THE STENT GRAFT WITH THE CONTROLLER PLACED IN POSITION "2". HOWEVER, THE SALES REPRESENTATIVE OBSERVED THAT ALTHOUGH THE DEPLOYMENT GRIP HAD ADVANCED PAST THE ARROW MARKER AND WAS SO CLOSE TO THE CONTROLLER THAT THERE WAS ALMOST NO DISTANCE TO THE CONTROLLER, THE INNER SHEATH HAD ONLY EXTENDED ONE STENT LENGTH OUT OF THE OUTER SHEATH. WHILE PRESSING THE DISENGAGEMENT BUTTON, THE REVERSE SLIDER TECHNIQUE WAS ATTEMPTED, BUT THE OUTER SHEATH WAS UNABLE TO BE RETRACTED. ROTATING THE DEPLOYMENT GRIP CLOCKWISE WAS ABLE TO ONLY PARTIALLY ADVANCE THE INNER SHEATH, LEAVING THREE STENT LENGTH OF INNER SHEATH REMAINING IN THE OUTER SHEATH, AND ALSO LEAVING NO SPACE BETWEEN THE CONTROLLER AND THE DEPLOYMENT GRIP FOR FURTHER MANIPULATION. THE CONTROLLER WAS PLACED IN THE "4" POSITION AND THE STAINLESS-STEEL ROD WAS PUSHED, BUT THE INNER SHEATH WAS UNABLE TO BE MOVED. SINCE THE REVERSE SLIDE TECHNIQUE WAS INEFFECTIVE, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS NO ALTERNATIVE BUT TO TURN THE DEPLOYMENT GRIP A
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20354220 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under P200045. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-2160-2026 · Apr 22, 2026 · Open, ClassifiedRelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System (various sizes) Reference numbers: 28-N4-32-104-32U 28-N4-32-164-28U 28-N4-32-164-32U 28-N4-32-209-28U 28-N4-32-209-32U 28-N4-32-259-32U 28-N4-
- Z-1383-2024 · Feb 22, 2024 · CompletedRELAY PRO Thoracic Stent-Graft System, containing one endovascular stent-graft system, IFU, and patient tracking card, sterile: (a) Part number 28-M4-34-100-34U; (b) Part number 2
Other System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment devices
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2814C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls34 deaths254 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3214C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls19 deaths173 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF3614C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT1 recall37 deaths214 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2514C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls18 deaths136 reports
- Endurant® IIs ESBF2314C103EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls9 deaths60 reports
- RelayPro Thoracic Stent-Graft System 28-N4-34-154-34UBolton Medical Inc. · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 recalls7 reports
- Vela Proximal Endograft System A34-34/C100-O20 VEndologix LLC · System, Endovascular Graft, Aortic Aneurysm Treatment3 deaths152 reports
- Endurant® II ETCF2828C49EMedtronic, Inc. · SYSTEM, ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT, AORTIC ANEURYSM TREATMENT2 recalls7 deaths44 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026 · each recall links to the FDA recall notice
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page