Skip to content

SOFTEC I SOFTECI+18.5Recalls & reported problems

Lenstec Barbados Inc · IOL - HEMA - 1pc 5.75/12.0mm · Class 3 · Implant

All models of SOFTEC I (26)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00844369029384), received between May 14, 2018 and Sep 12, 2024 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Contamination /Decontamination Problem” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
  • Contamination /Decontamination Problem1
  • Failure to Unfold or Unwrap1
  • Patient Device Interaction Problem1

Patient problems

  • Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available1
  • Blurred Vision1
  • Eye Pain1
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
  • Red Eye(s)1
  • Visual Impairment1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 12, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    LENSTEC RECEIVED AN EMAIL STATING "POSTOPERATIVE REDNESS, PAIN AND BLURRED VISION IN THE EYE."

    Patient problems: Blurred Vision; Eye Pain; Red Eye(s)

    MAUDE report 20208455 ↗
  • InjuryApr 15, 2021Failure to Unfold or Unwrap; Failure to Unfold or Unwrap

    LENSTEC RECEIVED AN EMAIL STATING " AFTER INSERTING THE LENS, THE LENS DID NOT UNFOLD PROPERLY. LENS WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED. CART45S CARTRIDGE USED. IMPLANT AND EXPLANT DATE (B)(6) 2021. INCISION ENLARGED TO REMOVE IOL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 11674942 ↗
  • InjurySep 16, 2020Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem; Contamination /Decontamination Problem; Patient Device Interaction Problem

    LENSTEC RECEIVED AN EMAIL STATING " DR. NOTICED A FROSTED APPEARANCE ON THE LENS AND REPLACED WITH A COMPETITORS LENS."

    Patient problems: Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms and Conditions Term/Code Not Available

    MAUDE report 10541555 ↗
  • InjuryMar 12, 2019Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    LENSTEC, INC. RECEIVED AN EMAIL NOTIFICATION STATING "LENS WAS IMPLANTED AND DOCTOR REMOVED AS POSTERIOR CAPSULE RUPTURE OCCURRED. IMPLANTED A STARR CQ LENS, NO STITCHES WERE NEEDED AND NO ADVERSE EVENT WITH PATIENT".

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 8411596 ↗
  • InjuryMay 14, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    LENSTEC INC RECEIVED AN EMAIL STATING THAT "ONE MONTH POST OP, THE DOCTOR SAW "DEPOSITS" ON THE POSTERIOR SIDE OF THE LENS. COULD ONLY BE VISUALIZED AT SLIT LAMP. WE PERFORMED AN IOL EXCHANGE. THIS LENS- LOOKS CLEAR NOW IS AVAILABLE TO COME BACK" THE INCISION WAS NOT ENLARGED TO REMOVE THE IOL AND THERE WAS NO PATIENT INJURY".

    Patient problems: Visual Impairment

    MAUDE report 7512628 ↗

Other Intraocular Lens devices

All Intraocular Lens devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page