Phoenix 2.4mm 7F Deflecting Atherectomy Catheter PD24127Recalls & reported problems
Volcano Atheromed, Inc. · Class 2
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 4
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 3
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00845225002633), received between May 18, 2018 and Feb 11, 2021 — classified as 3 injuries, 1 malfunction.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
Patient problems
- Embolism2
- Muscle Spasm(s)1
- No Consequences Or Impact To Patient1
- Vascular Dissection1
- Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In1
Recent adverse event reports
The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryFeb 11, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS CASE WAS REVIEWED AND INVESTIGATED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER¿S POLICY. IT WAS REPORTED DURING A THERAPEUTIC PERIPHERAL PROCEDURE, THE PHYSICIAN WAS PERFORMING AN ATHERECTOMY OF TWO LESIONS IN THE RIGHT SFA AND POPLITEAL. DURING THE SECOND PASSAGE OF THE DISTAL LESION THE HANDLE STOPPED TWICE. THE PHYSICIAN RECONNECTED THE HANDLE AND WE COULD PROCEED THE 2ND PASSAGE OF THE DISTAL POPLITEAL LESION. THE CONTROL ANGIOGRAPHY SHOWED THAN A DISSECTION IN THE POPLITEAL SEGMENT AND A LEAK OF CONTRAST MEDIA. THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO MAKE A PROLONGED DILATATION WITH ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS BALLOON DEVICE OVER 10 MINUTES WITH OUTSIDE PRESSURE FROM A BLOOD PRESSURE CUFF. CONTROL SHOWED A GOOD RESULT WITH NO LEAKS OF CONTRAST MEDIA. THE PHYSICIAN TREATED THE PROXIMAL LESION WITH AN ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS ANGIOPLASTY BALLOON. THE PHYSICIAN CHECKED THE LEG FROM PROXIMAL UP TO THE FOOT. IN CONSULTATION WITH THE VASCULAR SURGEON THE DECISION WAS TO KEEP IT WITHOUT STENTING. PATIENT WAS FINE ALL THE TIME, NO PAIN, NO ISSUES. THIS ADVERSE EVENT IS BEING SUBMITTED BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURES DEVICE WAS USED IN A PROCEDURE WHERE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED A VESSEL DISSECTION.
Patient problems: Vascular Dissection
MAUDE report 11319780 ↗InjuryJan 12, 2021Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THERE IS NO ALLEGATION THE MANUFACTURERS DEVICE MALFUNCTIONED. IT WAS REPORTED DURING A PLANNED THERAPEUTIC PERIPHERAL PROCEDURE, THE MANUFACTURERS DEVICE SUCCESSFULLY DEBULKED THE DESIRED LESION. RESISTANCE WAS EXPERIENCED, THE MANUFACTURERS ATHERECTOMY DEVICE AND ANOTHER MANUFACTURERS GUIDEWIRE DEVICE WERE REMOVED TOGETHER. THE MANUFACTURERS DEVICE WAS DISCARDED. AFTER REMOVAL OF THE DEVICES X-RAY SHOWED THE TIP OF THE GUIDEWIRE REMAINED IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA). THE TIP WAS REMOVED WITH A MICROSNARE. DURING TIP RETRIEVAL A DISTAL EMBOLIZATION OCCURRED AND WAS TREATED WITH AN ASPIRATION CATHETER AND NITROGLYCERIN. THE PATIENT WAS REPORTED AS "FINE" AT THE END OF THE PROCEDURE. FINAL ANGIOGRAPHY INDICATED THE LESION WAS WELL TREATED AND DISTAL BLOOD CIRCULATION WAS "FINE". LESION: CALCIFIED LESION FROM THE PROXIMAL SFA UP TO THE P2 SEGMENT. THIS ADVERSE EVENT IS BEING SUBMITTED BECAUSE THE MANUFACTURES DEVICE IS A CONCOMITANT DEVICE IN USE WHEN ANOTHER MANUFACTURES DEVICE SEPARATED IN A PATIENT. THERE IS NO ALLEGATION THE MANUFACTURERS DEVICE MALFUNCTIONED.
Patient problems: Embolism; Muscle Spasm(s); Vessel Or Plaque, Device Embedded In
MAUDE report 11155154 ↗InjuryNov 16, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS CASE WAS REVIEWED AND INVESTIGATED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S POLICY. IT WAS REPORTED THAT AFTER USING THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE TO SUCCESSFULLY TREAT AN IN STENT "RESTONOSIS" (ISR) OF 7/80 IN THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA), ANGIOGRAPHY DISPLAYED A DELAY IN CONTRAST MEDIA THAT STOPPED BELOW THE STENT. CHANGING TO AN ASPIRATION CATHETER IT WAS OBSERVED THAT FRESH THROMBUS MATERIAL FLUSHED INTO AN EXTERNAL FILTER. AFTER BALLOONING THE ISR WITH A DRUG COATED BALLOON (DCB) THE VESSEL SHOWED A SMALLER DIAMETER BELOW THE STENT WHICH WAS TREATED WITH A SPASMOLYTICUM AND A PLAIN OLD BALLOON ANGIOPLASTY (POBA). THIS EVENT IS BEING REPORTED BECAUSE THE PATIENT EXPERIENCED AN EMBOLISM. IT COULD NOT CONCLUSIVELY BE DETERMINED IF THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE CAUSED OR CONTRIBUTED TO THE EVENT.
Patient problems: Embolism
MAUDE report 8081503 ↗MalfunctionMay 18, 2018Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THIS CASE WAS REVIEWED AND INVESTIGATED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURER'S POLICY. IT WAS REPORTED, DURING A PERIPHERAL ATHERECTOMY PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN NOTICED THE GREEN MICROGLIDE COATING OF THE ABBOTT VASCULAR EXTRAS'PORT 0.014'' 300 CM GUIDEWIRE WAS DAMAGED BY THE BLADE OF THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE. THEY DECIDED TO STOP AND USE ANOTHER GUIDEWIRE AND THE ISSUE HAPPENED AGAIN. ANOTHER OF THE SAME MAKE AND MODEL OF THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE WAS USED TO CHECK IF THE PROBLEM WAS RELATED TO THE GUIDEWIRE OR THE MANUFACTURER'S DEVICE. NO HARM TO THE PATIENT AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH ANOTHER DEVICE (PTA+DCB). BY REPORT, THE MANUFACTURERS DEVICE WAS INTACT AND IN ONE PIECE UPON REMOVAL WITH NO DAMAGE OBSERVED. DAMAGE WAS OBSERVED ON THE ABBOTT VASCULAR EXTRAS'PORT 0.014'' 300 CM GUIDEWIRE. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED SUCCESSFULLY. THERE WAS NO STATUS DECLINE, INJURY NOR ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION REQUIRED TO PREVENT INJURY. TO DATE THE DEVICE HAS NOT BEEN RETURNED TO THE MANUFACTURER FOR ANALYSIS. CONCOMITANT DEVICES: ABBOTT VASCULAR EXTRAS'PORT 0.014'' 300 CM REF: 22235M LOT 8013061, TERUMO DESTINATION 7F 45 CM . THE INSTRUCTIONS FOR USE (IFU) CAUTIONS: USE ONLY LISTED COMPATIB
Patient problems: No Consequences Or Impact To Patient
MAUDE report 7526632 ↗
Other Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy devices
- HawkOne™ H1-MCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall367 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112266-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy288 reports
- JETSTREAM™ XC 112264-001Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy262 reports
- SET Rotarex®S 6F 135cm (Straub Medical®) Version 1.0Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 deaths206 reports
- SET Rotarex™S 6 F x 135 cm 80237Straub Medical AG · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy1 recall79 reports
- HawkOne™ H1-SCovidien LP · Catheter, peripheral, atherectomy1 recall70 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 420-006Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls19 reports
- Turbo-Elite Laser Atherectomy Catheter 417-152Spectranetics Corporation · Catheter, Peripheral, Atherectomy2 recalls16 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page