Tornier Perform® Reversed Glenoid DWJ334Recalls & reported problems
Tornier, Inc. · Peripheral Screw · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Tornier Perform Reversed Glenoid (41)
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832089697), received between Jun 29, 2023 and Mar 24, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem4
- Fracture2
- Break1
- Migration1
- Osseointegration Problem1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Infection2
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Failure of Implant1
- Inadequate Osseointegration1
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions1
- Post Operative Wound Infection1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMar 24, 2026Fracture
THE SURGEON WENT TO INSERT THE SCREW WITH THE SCREW APPROX 3/4 OF THE WAY DOWN THE SCREW BROKE. IT WAS NOTED THAT THE PATIENT HAD REALLY HARD BONE.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24676823 ↗InjuryNov 17, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED DUE TO AN ACROMIAL STRESS FRACTURE.
Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)
MAUDE report 23577614 ↗InjuryOct 30, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING REVISION SURGERY FOR A LOOSE BASEPLATE OF A PRIOR TORNIER RSA CONSTRUCT, THE SURGEON ATTEMPTED IMPLANTATION OF A ZIMMER BIOMET VRS DEVICE. THE VRS IMPLANT DISASSOCIATED FROM THE BONE INTRAOPERATIVELY, AND THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED WITH IMPLANTATION OF A REVIVE HEMIARTHROPLASTY COMPONENT.
Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration
MAUDE report 23427696 ↗InjuryOct 21, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT A REVISION SURGERY WAS PERFORMED USING THE BLUEPRINT PLANNING FEATURE. THE PATIENT HAD PREVIOUSLY UNDERGONE A PRIMARY SHOULDER PROCEDURE INVOLVING STRYKER/TORNIER IMPLANTS. FOLLOWING THE INITIAL SURGERY, THE PATIENT DEVELOPED AN INFECTION, AND ALL IMPLANTS WERE EXPLANTED WITH PLACEMENT OF AN ANTIBIOTIC SPACER. THE REVISION PROCEDURE INVOLVED REMOVAL OF THE SPACER AND CONVERSION TO A REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY.
Patient problems: Post Operative Wound Infection
MAUDE report 23349497 ↗InjuryMay 16, 2024Break; Fracture; Migration; Break; Fracture; Migration
THE PRIMARY REVERSE PROCEDURE EMPLOYED TORNIER IMPLANTS, INCLUDING THE SHOULDER ID BASEPLATE AND PERFORM HUMERAL. THE OBSERVED BASEPLATE FAILURE IS ATTRIBUTED TO LIKELY OVER-LATERALIZATION, STEMMING FROM THE THICKNESS OF THE SHOULDER ID BASEPLATE AND A LATERALIZED GLENOSPHERE. THE SCREW ALSO HAD A BREAKAGE.
Patient problems: Failure of Implant
MAUDE report 19328767 ↗InjuryFeb 26, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
THE REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED IN RESPONSE TO AN INFECTION. AN UPDATE PROVIDED INDICATES A LACK OF INFORMATION REGARDING THE LOT NUMBERS FOR THE SCREWS USED. HOWEVER, IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE INFECTION APPEARED TO BE LOCALIZED, AND THE PROCEDURE INVOLVED WASHING OUT AND EXCHANGING PARTS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 18784093 ↗InjuryJun 29, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT PRESENTED WITH SUPERFICIAL INFECTION. THE PHYSICIAN TREATED THE INFECTION WITH IRRIGATION AND DEBRIDEMENT WITH SALINE AND VANCOMYCIN POWDER. ALL THE HARDWARE WAS LEFT IN THE PATIENT AS THE DOCTOR DEEMED THE INFECTION WAS NOT DEEP ENOUGH TO HAVE BEEN A RESULT OF THE IMPLANTS. THE PATIENT WAS ADMINISTERED AND PRESCRIBED ANTIBIOTICS.
Patient problems: Unspecified Infection
MAUDE report 17233565 ↗
Other shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration devices
- DJO SURGICAL 508-36-101Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration508 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-101Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration433 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-103Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration421 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-036Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration1 recall259 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-32-104Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration1 recall203 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 509-00-032Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration233 reports
- DELTA XTEND 130760000Depuy (Ireland) · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration223 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 508-00-032Encore Medical, L.P. · shoulder prosthesis, reverse configuration122 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page