Tornier Perform® Reversed Glenoid DWJ718Recalls & reported problems

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 12 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00846832091225), received between Jan 19, 2023 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 12 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device Dislodged or Dislocated” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Most reported problems

Recent adverse event reports

The 12 most recent of 12 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

• InjurySep 11, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

  As reported: "Yesterday, the surgeon performed a revision for Pt F G. The glenoid had become unstable and the entire Perform+ construct (baseplate+post+peripheral screws+glenosphere) came out and rotated down. He removed the tray and liner from the humeral components, and due to the stem being well fixed, placed a cobolt-chrome head on instead making it a hemi construct."

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 50735224 ↗
• InjurySep 11, 2026Loosening of Implant Not Related to Bone-Ingrowth

  As reported: "Yesterday, the surgeon performed a revision for Pt F G. The glenoid had become unstable and the entire Perform+ construct (baseplate+post+peripheral screws+glenosphere) came out and rotated down. He removed the tray and liner from the humeral components, and due to the stem being well fixed, placed a cobolt-chrome head on instead making it a hemi construct."

  Patient problems: Insufficient Information

  MAUDE report 50735216 ↗
• InjuryFeb 6, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2025. DISLOCATION OF THE GLENOID COMPONENT WAS REPORTED. THE IMPACT ON PAIN AND RANGE OF MOTION WAS UNCLEAR. THE PHYSICIAN COMMENTED THAT THE CAUSE WAS THE PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY ISSUES AND THE INHERENTLY LOW BONE STOCK IN THE GLENOID CAVITY. IMAGES OF X-RAY ARE UNAVAILABLE. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2026.

  Patient problems: Subluxation

  MAUDE report 24280301 ↗
• InjuryFeb 6, 2026Device Dislodged or Dislocated

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT, THE PRIMARY SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2025. DISLOCATION OF THE GLENOID COMPONENT WAS REPORTED. THE IMPACT ON PAIN AND RANGE OF MOTION WAS UNCLEAR. THE PHYSICIAN COMMENTED THAT THE CAUSE WAS THE PATIENT'S BONE QUALITY ISSUES AND THE INHERENTLY LOW BONE STOCK IN THE GLENOID CAVITY. IMAGES OF X-RAY ARE UNAVAILABLE. THE REVISION SURGERY WAS CONDUCTED ON (B)(6) 2026.

  Patient problems: Subluxation

  MAUDE report 24280103 ↗
• InjurySep 18, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT; A PATIENT WAS BOOKING IN FOR A REVISION PROCEDURE DUE TO ONGOING PAIN AND STIFFNESS. DURING THE DISSECTION LOTS OF FLUID/ PUSS WAS SEEN AND THE DECISION WAS MADE TO DO A 2 STAGE PROCEDURE TO CLEAR THE INFECTION. ANOTHER REVISION PROCEDURE WILL BE NEEDED AFTER THE INFECTION HAS CLEARED. NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

  Patient problems: Loss of Range of Motion; Pain; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 23083928 ↗
• InjuryMar 26, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem

  PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY OPERATION IN (B)(6) 2023. HAD INCREASING PAIN IN OPERATED SHOULDER AND SOUGHT MEDICAL ADVICE WITH NON-PRIMARY SURGEON. X-RAYS AND CT SCANS SHOWED BASEPLATE WAS NOT FIXED TO SCAPULAR AND WAS SITTING WITHIN THE JOINT. ALSO SHOWED SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS TO REMAINING GLENOID. DECISION MADE TO REVISE IMPLANT. ORIGINAL IMPLANTS REMOVED. BONE LOSS TOO SIGNIFICANT TO DO A SINGLE STAGE REVISION. DECISION MADE TO BONE GRAFT AND LET HEAL TO BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE. PRIMARY FIXATION OF IMPLANT NOT ACHIEVED BY PRIMARY SURGEON. LOOSE IMPLANT CAUSED SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS IN GLENOID. REVISION SURGERY REQUIRED (MULTIPLE STAGES).

  Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation; Pain

  MAUDE report 21698096 ↗
• InjuryMar 26, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Osseointegration Problem

  PATIENT UNDERWENT PRIMARY OPERATION IN (B)(6) 2023. HAD INCREASING PAIN IN OPERATED SHOULDER AND SOUGHT MEDICAL ADVICE WITH NON-PRIMARY SURGEON. X-RAYS AND CT SCANS SHOWED BASEPLATE WAS NOT FIXED TO SCAPULAR AND WAS SITTING WITHIN THE JOINT. ALSO SHOWED SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS TO REMAINING GLENOID. DECISION MADE TO REVISE IMPLANT. ORIGINAL IMPLANTS REMOVED. BONE LOSS TOO SIGNIFICANT TO DO A SINGLE STAGE REVISION. DECISION MADE TO BONE GRAFT AND LET HEAL TO BE REVISED AT A LATER DATE. PRIMARY FIXATION OF IMPLANT NOT ACHIEVED BY PRIMARY SURGEON. LOOSE IMPLANT CAUSED SIGNIFICANT BONE LOSS IN GLENOID. REVISION SURGERY REQUIRED (MULTIPLE STAGES).

  Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration; Joint Dislocation; Pain

  MAUDE report 21695870 ↗
• InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  REVISION/ REMOVAL OF REVERSE II HUMERAL/PERFORM REVERSE GLENOID IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTATION OF CEMENT SPACER DUE TO INFECTION. SURGEON BECAME AWARE 4 WEEKS PRIOR OF INFECTION, DID WASHOUT UNSUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 19135061 ↗
• InjuryApr 18, 2024Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  REVISION/ REMOVAL OF REVERSE II HUMERAL/ PERFORM REVERSE GLENOID IMPLANTS AND IMPLANTATION OF CEMENT SPACER DUE TO INFECTION. SURGEON BECAME AWARE 4 WEEKS PRIOR OF INFECTION, DID WASHOUT UNSUCCESSFULLY.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 19134687 ↗
• InjuryMar 5, 2024Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Unstable; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A REVISION SURGERY DUE TO AN INFECTION. THE DEVICE WAS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH A CEMENT SPACER.

  Patient problems: Joint Laxity; Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 18842500 ↗
• InjuryOct 10, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  THE MANUFACTURER RECEIVED A REPORT FROM THE NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY THAT CONTAINS UNPUBLISHED COLLECTED DATA ON THE USAGE AND THE OUTCOMES WITH THE TORNIER SHOULDER SYSTEM. THE REPORT DETAILS ANALYSIS PROVIDED FOR PROCEDURES PERFORMED BETWEEN APRIL 2012 ¿ MAY 2022. DURING THE REVIEW OF THE REPORT, IT WAS IDENTIFIED THAT ON (B)(6) 2020 A PATIENT REQUIRED REVISION SURGERY DUE UNEXPLAINED PAIN, WHICH WAS NOT PREVIOUSLY REPORTED TO THE MANUFACTURER. REVISION PROCEDURE TYPE : SINGLE STAGE REVISION.

  Patient problems: Implant Pain

  MAUDE report 17909361 ↗
• InjuryJan 19, 2023Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

  INFECTION WAS FOUND IN A PATIENT AFTER ARTIFICIAL SHOULDER JOINT SURGERY.

  Patient problems: Unspecified Infection

  MAUDE report 16203641 ↗