Skip to content

RESTORIS 180603Recalls & reported problems

Mako Surgical Corp. · MCK Onlay Tibia Baseplate · Class 2 · Implant

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
5
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00848486000691), received between Mar 18, 2019 and Aug 14, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Osseointegration Problem” (2 reports).

5 other recalls cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831); they may or may not involve this specific model.

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 1 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Osseointegration Problem2
  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Loss of Osseointegration1
  • Migration1

Patient problems

  • Inadequate Osseointegration2
  • Injury2
  • Bone Fracture(s)1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 14, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    Due to factors such as the use of high-viscosity bone cement during implantation, the surgeon applied excessive impaction, resulting in a fracture of the tibial condyle. The procedure was completed by switching to total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

    Patient problems: Bone Fracture(s)

    MAUDE report 50251866 ↗
  • InjuryOct 20, 2025Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    AS REPORTED VIA MEDWATCH MW5176277: I HAD A PARTIAL KNEE REPLACEMENT IN 2023. I BEGAN HAVING INCREASED PAIN, INSTABILITY, AND A NOTICEABLE DEFORMITY IN THE KNEE WHEN IT WAS FLEXED IN THE EARLY SPRING OF 2024. A CT SCAN IN MAY SHOWED LOOSENING AND BONE LYSIS. IT QUICKLY WORSENED TO THE POINT WHERE I COULD FEEL THE KNEE JOINT SLIDING OVER MY TIBIA EVERY TIME I SHIFTED MY WEIGHT FORWARD. I HAD A REVISION TO A TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT IN 2024. THE OPERATIVE REPORT OF THE REVISION STATED "SIGNIFICANT POLYWEAR" AND "GROSS LOOSENING OF HER TIBIAL IMPLANT." IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT I WAS "ACL (ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT) DEFICIENT" AND HAD "FULL THICKNESS CARTILAGE LOSS IN THE REMAINING COMPARTMENTS." THE PHYSICIAN'S ASSISTANT THAT ASSISTED IN THE SURGERY TOLD ME THE NEXT MORNING THAT HE LIFTED THE IMPLANT OUT WITH ONE FINGER.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 23334640 ↗
  • InjuryOct 29, 2020Loss of Osseointegration; Loss of Osseointegration

    MAKO PKA REVISED DUE TO LOOSE BASEPLATE. PATIENT SOUGHT TREATMENT FOR PAIN.

    Patient problems: Inadequate Osseointegration

    MAUDE report 10759704 ↗
  • InjuryMar 25, 2020Osseointegration Problem; Osseointegration Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO LOOSENING (IT WAS NOT REPORTED TO THE REP WHICH DEVICE(S) EXPERIENCED LOOSENING. NO POSSIBLE CAUSE OR CONTRIBUTOR FOR LOOSENING WAS REPORTED TO THE REP). THE PATIENT'S MAKO PKA WAS REVISED TO A TOTAL CR KNEE. REP PROVIDED EXPLANT PICTURES, PRIMARY AND REVISION USAGE SHEETS, AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION WILL BE RELEASED BY THE HOSPITAL OR SURGEON.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 9876917 ↗
  • InjuryMar 18, 2019Migration; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT'S LEFT PARTIAL KNEE WAS REVISED DUE TO SUBSIDENCE OF THE BASEPLATE. A MAKO PARTIAL KNEE WAS REVISED TO A TRIATHLON TOTAL KNEE CONSTRUCT INCLUDING PATELLA. REP PROVIDED PRIMARY AND REVISION IMPLANT SHEETS AS WELL AS X-RAYS AND REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.

    Patient problems: Injury

    MAUDE report 8429285 ↗

Recalls under the same FDA submission

These recalls involve devices cleared under K082172, K090763, K150307, K220930, K242831. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.

  • Z-1385-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 5 RM/LL), REF 170615, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-1386-2023 · Mar 10, 2023 · Open, Classified
    stryker MAKO RESTORIS MCK BASEPLATE TRIAL (SIZE 6 RM/LL), REF 170616, intended for use in a Partial Knee Arthroplasty surgical procedure
  • Z-2051-2018 · Jan 19, 2018 · Terminated
    Restoris MCK Onlay Insert Extractor.
  • Z-1031-2016 · Jan 15, 2016 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System RESTORIS MCK is indicated for single or multi-compartmental knee replacement used in conjunction with RIO.
  • Z-1132-2014 · Jan 9, 2014 · Terminated
    Restoris Multicompartmental Knee (MCK) System is an implant system designed to be used with MAKO's Robotic Arm Interactive Orthopedic System (RIO). It is composed of a unicompartme

Other PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices

All PROSTHESIS, KNEE, FEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, METAL/POLYMER devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.