LifeBand® Load-distributing Band 100 (REF 8700-0701-16)Recalls & reported problems
Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Single-use chest compression band. (1 per package) · Class 2
All models of LifeBand Load-distributing Band (9)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 5
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00849111001601), received between Nov 7, 2020 and May 5, 2023 — classified as 5 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Material Integrity Problem” (4 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K112998); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Material Integrity Problem4
- Material Twisted/Bent3
- Break1
- Use of Device Problem1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
Recent adverse event reports
The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionMay 5, 2023Break; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Material Integrity Problem
DURING PATIENT USE, ONE OF THE HINGED BELT GUARDS (SKIRTS) OF THE LIFEBAND (LOT # 168928) BROKE APART. THE CUSTOMER CONTINUED THE RESUSCITATION ATTEMPT WITH MANUAL CPR. NO CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACTS ON THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 16881627 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2021Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent
AN AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #1 (SN UNKNOWN) WAS DEPLOYED BY THE EMS TEAM #1 FOR RESUSCITATING A (B)(6) YEARS OLD MALE PATIENT ((B)(6) KG) IN CARDIAC ARREST CAUSED BY PERSISTENT VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS OF TRAUMA OBSERVED. THE CARDIAC ARREST WAS WITNESSED. THE MANUAL CPR WAS PERFORMED BY THE BYSTANDER FOR AN UNKNOWN PERIOD. THE BASIC LIFE SUPPORT STARTED 5-8 MINUTES AFTER THE COLLAPSE AND ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT WAS STARTED 10 MIN AFTER THE COLLAPSE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE NEW MATERIAL OF THE AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND (LOT # UNKNOWN) IS TOO SOFT, CAUSING THE LIFEBAND TO BE MORE LIKELY TWISTED AROUND ITSELF, ON THE AUTOPULSE EDGES, WHILE TRYING TO BE INSTALLED ON THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM. THIS ISSUE CAUSES THE AUTOPULSE DRIVESHAFT TO GET STUCK UPON TURNING ON. THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM FAILS TO SIZE THE PATIENT. THE CUSTOMER TRIED TO PULL UP THE LIFEBAND, HOWEVER, THE ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM #1 CONTINUED PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR UNTIL THE ARRIVAL OF EMS TEAM #2. THE EMS TEAM #2 DEPLOYED THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #2 (SN UNKNOWN), HOWEVER, THE SAME ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM CONTINUE PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR FOR 38 MINUTES UNTIL THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED T
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12621031 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2021Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent
AN AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #1 (SN UNKNOWN) WAS DEPLOYED BY THE EMS TEAM #1 FOR RESUSCITATING A (B)(6) YEARS OLD MALE PATIENT ((B)(6)KG) IN CARDIAC ARREST CAUSED BY PERSISTENT VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS OF TRAUMA OBSERVED. THE CARDIAC ARREST WAS WITNESSED. THE MANUAL CPR WAS PERFORMED BY THE BYSTANDER FOR AN UNKNOWN PERIOD. THE BASIC LIFE SUPPORT STARTED 5-8 MINUTES AFTER THE COLLAPSE AND ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT WAS STARTED 10 MIN AFTER THE COLLAPSE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE NEW MATERIAL OF THE AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND (LOT # UNKNOWN) IS TOO SOFT, CAUSING THE LIFEBAND TO BE MORE LIKELY TWISTED AROUND ITSELF, ON THE AUTOPULSE EDGES, WHILE TRYING TO BE INSTALLED ON THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM. THIS ISSUE CAUSES THE AUTOPULSE DRIVESHAFT TO GET STUCK UPON TURNING ON. THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM FAILS TO SIZE THE PATIENT. THE CUSTOMER TRIED TO PULL UP THE LIFEBAND, HOWEVER, THE ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM #1 CONTINUED PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR UNTIL THE ARRIVAL OF EMS TEAM #2. THE EMS TEAM #2 DEPLOYED THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #2 (SN UNKNOWN), HOWEVER, THE SAME ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM CONTINUE PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR FOR 38 MINUTES UNTIL THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12621030 ↗MalfunctionOct 13, 2021Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent; Material Integrity Problem; Material Twisted/Bent
AN AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #1 (SN UNKNOWN) WAS DEPLOYED BY THE EMS TEAM #1 FOR RESUSCITATING A (B)(6) YEARS OLD MALE PATIENT ((B)(6)KG) IN CARDIAC ARREST CAUSED BY PERSISTENT VENTRICULAR FIBRILLATION. THERE WERE NO SIGNS OR SYMPTOMS OF TRAUMA OBSERVED. THE CARDIAC ARREST WAS WITNESSED. THE MANUAL CPR WAS PERFORMED BY THE BYSTANDER FOR AN UNKNOWN PERIOD. THE BASIC LIFE SUPPORT STARTED 5-8 MINUTES AFTER THE COLLAPSE AND ADVANCE LIFE SUPPORT WAS STARTED 10 MIN AFTER THE COLLAPSE. THE CUSTOMER REPORTED THAT THE NEW MATERIAL OF THE AUTOPULSE LIFEBAND (LOT # UNKNOWN) IS TOO SOFT, CAUSING THE LIFEBAND TO BE MORE LIKELY TWISTED AROUND ITSELF, ON THE AUTOPULSE EDGES, WHILE TRYING TO BE INSTALLED ON THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM. THIS ISSUE CAUSES THE AUTOPULSE DRIVESHAFT TO GET STUCK UPON TURNING ON. THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM FAILS TO SIZE THE PATIENT. THE CUSTOMER TRIED TO PULL UP THE LIFEBAND, HOWEVER, THE ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM #1 CONTINUED PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR UNTIL THE ARRIVAL OF EMS TEAM #2. THE EMS TEAM #2 DEPLOYED THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM #2 (SN UNKNOWN), HOWEVER, THE SAME ISSUE PERSISTED. THE EMS TEAM CONTINUE PERFORMING THE MANUAL CPR FOR 38 MINUTES UNTIL THE PATIENT WAS TRANSFERRED TO
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 12621025 ↗MalfunctionNov 7, 2020Use of Device Problem; Use of Device Problem
AS REPORTED, THE CUSTOMER WAS UNABLE TO PROPERLY INSTALL THE LIFEBAND (LOT # UNKNOWN) TO THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM (SN: (B)(4)). WHEN THE LIFEBAND WAS INSTALLED, IT WAS LOOSE AND THE CLIPS DID NOT STAY-IN-PLACE DURING PATIENT TRANSPORT. AS PER THE CUSTOMER, THE ISSUE WAS OBSERVED WITH THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM DURING BOTH SHIFT CHECKS AND PATIENT USE, AND DIFFERENT LIFEBANDS WERE TESTED; HOWEVER, THE SAME ISSUE WAS OBSERVED. NO ERROR MESSAGES OR FAULT CODES OBSERVED ON THE PLATFORM. NO CONSEQUENCES OR IMPACT TO PATIENT. PLEASE SEE THE FOLLOWING RELATED MFR REPORT: MFR # 3010617000-2020-01102 FOR THE AUTOPULSE PLATFORM (SN: (B)(4)).
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 10805935 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K112998. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0118-2023 · Sep 22, 2022 · Open, ClassifiedAutoPulse Li-ion Battery used on the AutoPulse Resuscitation System Model 100. used as an adjunct to manual CPR
Other Compressor, Cardiac, External devices
- AutoPulse®Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External3,208 reports
- AutoPulse Li-ion Battery™ 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External1,151 reports
- AutoPulse® Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External1,136 reports
- AutoPulse®Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External317 reports
- AutoPulse®Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External276 reports
- AutoPulse®Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External250 reports
- AutoPulse®Resuscitation System 100Zoll Circulation, Inc. · Compressor, Cardiac, External241 reports
- LUCAS 99576Jolife AB · Compressor, cardiac, external2 recalls9 deaths99 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page