X-PAC EI2473LTRecalls & reported problems
Expanding Innovations, Inc. · X-Pac 12mm x 32mm Lordotic Tall · Class 2 · Implant
Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 2
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 1
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850001720250), received between Sep 3, 2025 and Apr 1, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Collapse” (2 reports).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Collapse2
Patient problems
- Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion2
Recent adverse event reports
The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionApr 1, 2026Collapse
THE DEVICE WAS IMPLANTED AT L3-L4 ON (B)(6) 2025. INTRAOPERATIVE IMAGES PROVIDED BY THE SURGEON INDICATE THE CAGE WAS PARTIALLY EXPANDED AT THE TIME OF DEPLOYMENT. FOLLOW-UP IMAGING OBTAINED ON (B)(6) 2025 DEMONSTRATES A REDUCTION IN CAGE HEIGHT. THE DEVICE REMAINS IMPLANTED IN THIS CONDITION. PER THE SURGEON, THE PATIENT HAS DEMONSTRATED CONTINUED CLINICAL IMPROVEMENT AND REPORTED SATISFACTION AT FOLLOW-UP VISITS ON (B)(6) 2025 AND (B)(6) 2026. THE EVENT WAS REPORTED TO EI BY THE SURGEON DURING A ROUTINE FOLLOW-UP COMMUNICATION ON (B)(6) 2026.
Patient problems: Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion
MAUDE report 24760408 ↗InjurySep 3, 2025Collapse; Collapse
EXPANDING INNOVATIONS WAS NOTIFIED THAT A 2 LEVEL TLIF PROCEDURE HAD USED A 12X32 LORDOTIC IMPLANT WHICH EXHIBITED AN INTRA-OP REDUCTION IN HEIGHT AFTER EXPANSION. THE SCRUB TECH REPORTED HAVING DIFFICULTY ASSEMBLING THE CAGE/CANNULA/INSERTER SYSTEM. THE CAGE WAS INSERTED BY THE SURGEON AND EXPANDED. INTRA-OP IMAGES TAKEN DURING THE PROCEDURE SHOWED THE REDUCTION IN EXPANSION AFTER INITIAL EXPANSION.
Patient problems: Intervertebral Disc Compression or Protrusion
MAUDE report 22954894 ↗
Other Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar devices
- T-PAL 03.812.003Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar152 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.004Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar120 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068073Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall66 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall51 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6068076Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall46 reports
- EIT TLIF Inserter TFT30101EIT Emerging Implant Technologies GmbH · Intervertebral Fusion Device With Bone Graft, Lumbar88 reports
- T-PAL 03.812.001Synthes GmbH · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar76 reports
- Catalyft PL Expandable Interbody System 6069096Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc. · Intervertebral fusion device with bone graft, lumbar1 recall25 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 16, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page