Skip to content

Prodigy Twist™ TWIST8FRecalls & reported problems

Imperative Care, Inc. · 8F Prodigy Twist™, 134cm · Class 2

Adverse event reports
2
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
2
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 2 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850032079150), received between Apr 12, 2024 and Dec 24, 2025 — classified as 2 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 1 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 1 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem1
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Material Separation1

Patient problems

  • Obstruction/Occlusion1
  • Stenosis1
  • Vascular Dissection1

Recent adverse event reports

The 2 most recent of 2 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryDec 24, 2025Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTERY (SFA) WAS TREATED USING A THIRD-PARTY SHEATH, 8F PRODIGY CATHETER, AND 8F PRODIGY TWIST. THE CLOT WAS ORGANIZED. A VESSEL DISSECTION WAS DIAGNOSED, WHICH THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNAWARE OF UNTIL THE INITIAL ANGIOGRAM. THE DISSECTION IMPEDED BLOOD FLOW TO THE FOOT. IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE DISSECTION WAS THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THE LACK OF FLOW AND WAS UNRELATED TO THE CATHETER'S ABILITY TO REMOVE CLOT. IT IS UNKNOWN WHETHER ANY ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION WAS PERFORMED TO ADDRESS THE DISSECTION. THERE WAS NO MALFUNCTION REPORTED DURING THE PROCEDURE.

    Patient problems: Vascular Dissection

    MAUDE report 23889524 ↗
  • InjuryApr 12, 2024Material Separation; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Separation; Detachment of Device or Device Component

    THE INTRAVASCULAR PROCEDURE BEGAN WITH CONTRALATERAL ACCESS WITH AN 8F PINNACLE SHEATH IN THE LEFT GROIN. A SERIES OF THIRD-PARTY CATHETERS, SHEATHS, AND WIRES WERE UTILIZED TO ACCESS THE GRAFT LOCATION WITH NO REPORTED CHALLENGES. ONCE ACCESS TO THE INTENDED LOCATION WAS OBTAINED, THE 8F PRODIGY CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THREE ASPIRATION PASSES WITH NO CLOT CAPTURE AND MINIMAL BLOOD LOSS. THE PRODIGY CATHETER WAS NOT LONG ENOUGH TO REACH THE DISTAL PORTION (INCLUDING THE DISTAL ANASTOMOSIS) OF THE GRAFT. TWO ADDITIONAL PASSES WERE COMPLETED WITH THE 8F PRODIGY TWIST BY ROTATING THE TWIST HANDLE CLOCKWISE WITH ONE HAND. ON THE FIRST PASS WITH THE TWIST, 7-10 CYCLES WERE CONDUCTED. THE MOVEMENT OF TWIST WAS MONITORED INTERMITTENTLY UNDER FLUOROSCOPY AND FELT SMOOTH TO THE PHYSICIAN WITH NO TACTILE VARIATION. ON THE SECOND PASS WITH TWIST, 3-5 CYCLES WERE CONDUCTED. SEPARATION OF TWIST TIP WAS NOTED WHEN DISTAL MARKERS ON THE TWIST TIP DID NOT MOVE AS ANTICIPATED UNDER FLUOROSCOPY. TWIST TIP WAS LOCATED BY FLUOROSCOPY IN THE GRAFT LUMEN . SEVERAL ATTEMPTS WERE MADE TO ASPIRATE SEPARATED TIP THROUGH THE CATHETER BUT UNSUCCESSFUL. A STENT WAS DEPLOYED IN THE GRAFT TO TRAP THE TWIST

    Patient problems: Obstruction/Occlusion; Stenosis

    MAUDE report 19099125 ↗

Other Peripheral Mechanical Thrombectomy With Aspiration devices

All Peripheral Mechanical Thrombectomy With Aspiration devices →

Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.