Skip to content

LimFlow Extension Stent Graft RGS-55200-US-24Recalls & reported problems

Inari Medical, Inc. · LimFlow Extension Stent Graft (5.5 mm x 200 mm). The LimFlow Extension Stent Graft is indicated for patients who have chronic limb-threatening ischemia with no suitable endovascular or surgical revascularization options and are at risk of major amputation. · Class 3 · Implant

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00850041730219), received between Oct 17, 2025 and Sep 11, 2026 — classified as 1 injury, 4 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Physical Resistance/Sticking” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 1 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 2 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 1 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 1 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Physical Resistance/Sticking4
  • Detachment of Device or Device Component1
  • Stretched1
  • Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions5
  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • MalfunctionSep 11, 2026Physical Resistance/Sticking

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 50736203 ↗
  • MalfunctionMay 7, 2026Detachment of Device or Device Component

    ON (B)(6) 2026, A PATIENT UNDERWENT A PROCEDURE USING THE LIMFLOW SYSTEM OF DEVICES. THE PROCEDURE PROGRESSED SUCCESSFULLY TO STENT DEPLOYMENT. AFTERWARD IT WAS FOUND THAT A PIECE OF THE CATHETER HAD BROKEN OFF INTO THE PATIENT. THE SURGEON WAS ABLE TO REMOVE IT AND COMPLETED THE CASE.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 25114198 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 11, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT TRANSCATHETER ARTERIALIZATION OF DEEP VEIN (TADV) USING LIMFLOW DEVICES. THE LIMFLOW EXTENSION STENT GRAFT, 200MM (RGS-55200-US-24) PARTIALLY DEPLOYED A STENT, REQUIRING THE PHYSICIAN TO DISASSEMBLE THE DEVICE HANDLE AND REMOVE ALL PIECES OF THE DEVICE FROM THE PATIENT. THIS DID NOT RESULT IN ANY PATIENT HARM AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23785459 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 3, 2025Physical Resistance/Sticking; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON (B)(6) 2025, A PATIENT UNDERWENT TRANSCATHETER ARTERIALIZATION OF DEEP VEIN (TADV) USING LIMFLOW DEVICES. THE LIMFLOW EXTENSION STENT GRAFT, 200MM (RGS-55200-US-24) PARTIALLY DEPLOYED A STENT, REQUIRING THE PHYSICIAN TO DISASSEMBLE THE DEVICE HANDLE AND FINISH THE DEPLOYMENT MANUALLY. THIS DID NOT RESULT IN ANY PATIENT HARM AND THE PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFUL.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23709322 ↗
  • InjuryOct 17, 2025Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Physical Resistance/Sticking; Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area; Stretched; Physical Resistance/Sticking

    ON (B)(6) 2025 DURING A LIMFLOW PROCEDURE, THE MEDICAL TEAM EXPERIENCED ISSUES WITH UNSUCCESSFUL STENT DEPLOYMENTS. AFTER ONE STENT GRAFT SYSTEM NOT DEPLOYING, A SECOND SYSTEM WAS USED. THE SECOND STENT GRAFT SYSTEM DEPLOYED APPROXIMATELY ONE THIRD OF THE WAY BEFORE IT STOPPED DEPLOYING. THE PHYSICIAN ACCESSED THE INSIDE OF THE HANDLE TO ATTEMPT TO MANUALLY DEPLOY THE REST OF THE STENT. WHEN THIS WAS UNSUCCESSFUL, THE PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO PULL THE ENTIRE SYSTEM FROM THE PATIENT RESULTING IN THE STENT STRETCHING AND EXTENDING PAST THE ANASTOMOSIS WITH THE POTENTIAL OF OCCLUDING OTHER VESSELS. TO PREVENT POTENTIAL ACUTE ISCHEMIA, THE PHYSICIAN PROCEEDED WITH FENESTRATING THE STRETCHED STENT PORTIONS ALONG BIFURCATING ARTERIAL VESSELS. ADDITIONALLY, THE STRETCHED PORTIONS OF THE STENT WERE RELINED WITH OTHER STENTS.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant; No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 23328461 ↗

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page