EnVisio ENVISIO-SYSRecalls & reported problems
Elucent Medical, Inc. · EnVisio Navigation System: contains EnVisio Navigation Patient Pad and EnVisio Navigation System Heads Up Display · Class 2
- Adverse event reports
- 7
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 5
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 7 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00851674008034), received between Sep 21, 2023 and Feb 20, 2026 — classified as 5 injuries, 2 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (3 reports).
1 other recall cover devices cleared under the same FDA submission (K183400); they may or may not involve this specific model.
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Device-Device Incompatibility3
- Device Dislodged or Dislocated2
- Device Sensing Problem2
- Electrical /Electronic Property Problem1
- Erratic or Intermittent Display1
- Malposition of Device1
- Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings1
Patient problems
- Unspecified Tissue Injury4
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2
- Blister1
Recent adverse event reports
The 7 most recent of 7 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionFeb 20, 2026Device Sensing Problem
A LOCALIZATION CLIP WAS IMPLANTED TO MARK A TARGET LESION PRIOR TO SURGICAL EXCISION. DURING THE SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE, THE SYSTEM BRIEFLY DETECTED THE CLIP BUT WAS UNABLE TO MAINTAIN LOCALIZATION, AND THE PROCEDURE COULD NOT BE COMPLETED AS INTENDED. THE PATIENT LATER UNDERWENT A SECOND PROCEDURE DURING WHICH AN ADDITIONAL CLIP WAS IMPLANTED TO FACILITATE LOCALIZATION AND EXCISION. THE LESION WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED. PATHOLOGY CONFIRMED BOTH CLIPS WERE PRESENT IN THE EXCISED SPECIMEN. THE DEVICES WERE NOT RETURNED FOR EVALUATION.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 24408347 ↗InjuryJun 10, 2025Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Malposition of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Use of Incorrect Control/Treatment Settings; Malposition of Device; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
THREE CLIPS WERE IMPLANTED TO LOCALIZE A TARGET. POST-IMPLANT IMAGING REVEALED ALL THREE CLIPS TO BE POSITIONED OUTSIDE OF THE LESION. DURING THE SUBSEQUENT SURGICAL PROCEDURE, TWO CLIPS WERE BRACKETED TO GUIDE TISSUE EXCISION. UPON REMOVAL OF THE LOCALIZED SPECIMEN, ONLY ONE CLIP WAS CONFIRMED WITHIN THE EXCISED TISSUE. THE REMAINING TWO CLIPS WERE NOT RETRIEVED, NECESSITATING A SECOND SURGICAL EXCISION TO LOCATE AND REMOVE THE RESIDUAL MARKERS AND THE TARGET LESION.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 22181430 ↗InjuryJun 4, 2025Device Dislodged or Dislocated; Device Dislodged or Dislocated
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING NAVIGATION, THE SMARTCLIP WAS DISPLACED FROM THE TARGET LOCATION. THE DISPLACEMENT OF THE SMARTCLIP PREVENTED SURGICAL NAVIGATION RESULTING IN INCOMPLETE REMOVAL OF THE TARGET TISSUE. A SECOND SURGICAL PROCEDURE WAS REPORTED TO BE REQUIRED.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 22142107 ↗InjuryJan 29, 2025Device Sensing Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility; Device Sensing Problem; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING NAVIGATION, THE ENVISIO SYSTEM WAS NOT CONSISTENTLY DISPLAYING NAVIGATION TO THE TARGETED CLIP. AFTER THE CASE WAS CONCLUDED, THE GROUNDING PAD WAS FOUND TO BE OVERLAPPING THE PATIENT PAD. WHEN THE GROUNDING PAD WAS REMOVED, A BLISTER WAS FOUND ON THE PATIENT BENEATH WHERE THE GROUNDING PAD WAS PLACED.
Patient problems: Blister
MAUDE report 21268651 ↗MalfunctionNov 15, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DURING A CASE WHICH WAS SETUP WITH THE ENVISIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SKYTRON 6702 OR BED WAS INCLINED TO A NEAR VERTICAL POSITION. AS THE BACK SECTION OF THE OR BED INCLINED A COMPONENT OF THE ENVISIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM, THE ENVISIO PATIENT PAD TRANSITION PAD WAS COMPRESSED BETWEEN THE X-RAY RISERS ON THE BACK AND SEAT SECTIONS OF THE OR BED. THE COMPRESSION OF THE PATIENT PAD TRANSITION CUSHION CAUSED SUFFICIENT BACK PRESSURE TO CAUSE THE BACK PORTION OF THE SKYTRON OR BED BECAME DISASSOCIATED FROM THE BED FRAME. THERE WAS NO REPORTED PATIENT INJURY RESULTING FROM THIS EVENT. ELUCENT IS FILING THIS REPORT DUE TO THE POTENTIAL FOR INJURY.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 20697053 ↗InjuryApr 26, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
DURING A CASE USING THE ENVISIO¿ NAVIGATION SYSTEM, IT WAS REPORTED THAT TWO 'PINK' SMARTCLIPS WERE IMPLANTED IN THE SAME PATIENT. THIS EVENT COINCIDED WITH EXCESS TISSUE REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT. (SMARTCLIP SOFT TISSUE MARKERS ARE AVAILABLE IN THREE DIFFERENT VERSIONS, PINK, GREEN AND PURPLE. THE SMARTCLIP VERSIONS ARE IDENTICAL IN MATERIALS OF CONSTRUCTION, BUT ARE DIFFERENTIATED BY DIFFERENT FREQUENCIES THEY EMIT WHEN LOCALIZED BY THE ENVISIO NAVIGATION SYSTEM).
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 19197641 ↗InjurySep 21, 2023Erratic or Intermittent Display; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem; Erratic or Intermittent Display; Electrical /Electronic Property Problem
DURING A CASE USING THE ENVISIO¿ NAVIGATION SYSTEM, IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE SYSTEM NAVIGATION WAS SLOW OR LAGGING. THIS EVENT COINCIDED WITH EXCESS TISSUE REMOVAL FROM THE PATIENT.
Patient problems: Unspecified Tissue Injury
MAUDE report 17789290 ↗
Recalls under the same FDA submission
These recalls involve devices cleared under K183400. One submission often covers many models, so check the product and lot details in each record.
- Z-0806-2025 · Nov 18, 2024 · Open, ClassifiedEnVisio Patient Pad Transition Cushion, Model/Catalog Number: ENVISIO-SYS Product Description: The EnVisio Patient Pad Transition Cushion is a component of the EnVisio Navigation S
Other Marker, Radiographic, Implantable devices
- BioZorb F0202Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls192 reports
- BioZorb F0221Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE3 recalls15 reports
- BioZorb F0203Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls51 reports
- BioZorb F0231Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0304Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0303Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls19 reports
- BioZorb F0404Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls6 reports
- BioZorb F0331Hologic, Inc. · MARKER, RADIOGRAPHIC, IMPLANTABLE2 recalls4 reports
Sources: FDA GUDID, MAUDE and Medical Device Recalls via openFDA. openFDA data is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.