Skip to content

Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-301620Recalls & reported problems

Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Class 2 · Implant

All models of Arcos Modular Revision Hip System (71)

Data updated Oct 16, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
1
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
1
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00880304473775), received between Sep 14, 2023 and Sep 14, 2023 — classified as 1 injury.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Migration” (1 report).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 16, 2026.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Migration1
  • Migration or Expulsion of Device1

Patient problems

  • Failure of Implant1

Recent adverse event reports

The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjurySep 14, 2023Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration; Migration or Expulsion of Device; Migration

    IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A REVISION OF UNKNOWN DEVICES, THE DOCTOR NOTED THAT THE ACETABULUM WAS NOT PREPARED CORRECTLY; THEREFORE, INSERTED THE CUP WITH FIXATION OF FOUR SCREWS. DURING THE ATTEMPTS OF REDUCTION, ENCOUNTERED DIFFICULTY AND UPON DELIVERY OF FORCE, LED TO ROTATION OF THE PRESS-FIT FEMORAL STEM. A CURVED STEM WAS THEN PLACED AND AS ADDITIONAL REDUCTION ATTEMPTS WERE MADE, THE STEM ALSO ROTATED, LEADING TO THE STEM BEING CEMENTED. IN THE PROCESS OF TESTING THE HIP, ONE EVENT OF DISLOCATION OCCURRED; THEREFORE, ADDITIONAL REDUCTION MANEUVERS WERE REPEATED. THE PROCEDURE WAS COMPLETED AND THE PATIENT WAS TRANSPORTED OUT OF THE OR. AFTER APPROXIMATELY 1 HOUR, THE PATIENT WAS RETURNED TO THE OR DUE TO DISLOCATION. THE LINER WAS REVISED TO A FREEDOM LINER AND WAS SUCCESSFULLY REDUCED WITHOUT DISLOCATION. SUBSEQUENTLY, DUE TO THE USE OF TENSILE FORCE, THE CUP DETACHED FROM THE ACETABULAR WALL AND THE PATIENT WAS HOSPITALIZED HIP PENDENT. THERE IS NO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.

    Patient problems: Failure of Implant

    MAUDE report 17744750 ↗

Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices

All Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, uncemented, metal/polymer, non-porous, calicum-phosphate devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page