Arcos Modular Revision Hip System 11-300816Recalls & reported problems
Biomet Orthopedics, LLC · Class 2 · Implant
All models of Arcos Modular Revision Hip System (71)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 9
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 6
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 9 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00880304474239), received between Jan 10, 2022 and Jun 12, 2026 — classified as 6 injuries, 3 malfunctions.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Device-Device Incompatibility” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Reports received per month
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem3
- Device-Device Incompatibility1
- Difficult or Delayed Positioning1
- Difficult to Insert1
- Implant subsidence1
- Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size1
- Separation Failure1
Patient problems
- No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
- Pain2
- Ambulation or Postural Difficulties1
- Aseptic loosening1
- Bone Fracture(s)1
- Foreign Body In Patient1
- Joint Laxity1
- Numbness1
Recent adverse event reports
The 9 most recent of 9 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
InjuryJun 12, 2026Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING IMPLANTATION OF THE NEW PROSTHESIS, A DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURE OCCURRED, AND THE CANAL WAS STABILIZED BEFORE PROCEEDING. THE PATIENT SUSTAINED AN INTRA-OPERATIVE DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURE THAT WAS TREATED WITH CABLE FIXATION. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Periprosthetic fracture
MAUDE report 25484651 ↗InjuryMay 12, 2026Separation Failure
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A HIP PROCEDURE, THE SCREWDRIVER TIP BROKE OFF IN THE PROXIMAL BODY WHILE TORQUING THE BODY TO THE DISTAL STEM. THE BROKEN PIECE WAS UNABLE TO BE REMOVED. THE PROXIMAL BODY WAS ALSO UNABLE TO BE REMOVED FROM THE DISTAL STEM SO THE IMPLANTS REMAINED IN PLACE AND THE BROKEN PIECE WAS RETAINED IN THE PATIENT. THERE WAS APPROXIMATELY A TEN-MINUTE DELAY IN ATTEMPTING TO REMOVE THE BROKEN SCREWDRIVER TIP AND THE IMPLANTS. THERE HAS BEEN NO KNOWN IMPACT DUE TO THE RETAINED SCREWDRIVER TIP. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient
MAUDE report 25148112 ↗InjuryJun 24, 2025Implant subsidence; Implant subsidence
IT WAS REPORTED THAT THE PATIENT UNDERWENT A HIP PROCEDURE. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE PATIENT WAS REVISED APPROXIMATELY 6 YEARS POST-IMPLANTATION DUE TO SUBSIDENCE, AMBULATION DIFFICULTIES, LIMPING, AND INSTABILITY. DURING THE REVISION NOTED SCAR TISSUE, SUBSIDENCE, AND SHORTENING MAKING IT HARD TO DISLOCATE THE HIP. THERE WAS ALSO 50% OF THE DISTAL CEMENTLESS STEM PROTRUDING OUTSIDE OF THE LATERAL CORTEX OF THE FEMUR, CAUSING A FRACTURE. IT WAS ALSO NOTED THAT THE PREVIOUS STEM WAS PLACED INTO AN INADEQUATE REMOVAL OF THE CEMENT FROM THE INTRAMEDULLARY CANAL AND IS THE REASON FOR THE GROSS FAILURE. THE SHELL WAS WELL FIXED AND REMAINED IMPLANTED WITH ALL OTHER COMPONENTS EXPLANTED WITHOUT COMPLICATIONS. IT WAS REPORTED THAT NO FURTHER INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE.
Patient problems: Ambulation or Postural Difficulties; Aseptic loosening; Bone Fracture(s); Joint Laxity; Numbness; Pain; Scar Tissue
MAUDE report 22319608 ↗InjuryJan 28, 2025Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size; Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size
NO FURTHER INFORMATION AT THE TIME OF THIS REPORT.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 21252347 ↗MalfunctionMay 20, 2024Device-Device Incompatibility; Device-Device Incompatibility
IT WAS REPORTED THAT DURING A PROCEDURE, IT WAS DIFFICULT TO FIX THE PROXIMAL BODY ONTO THE DISTAL STEM. THERE WAS A 35 MINUTE DELAY TO SURGERY. THERE WAS NO KNOWN IMPACT OR CONSEQUENCES TO THE PATIENT. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND NO FURTHER INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 19352312 ↗InjurySep 30, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT IS EXPERIENCING EXCRUCIATING PAIN AT SEVERAL FOLLOW UPS AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY. THE PATIENT WAS TREATED WITH ANALGESIA AND THE PAIN HAS SINCE RESOLVED. THE DEVICES REMAIN IMPLANTED. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Pain
MAUDE report 15510527 ↗InjurySep 14, 2022Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem; Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem
IT WAS REPORTED THAT PATIENT EXPERIENCED WOUND DEHISCENCE APPROXIMATELY 3 WEEKS AFTER A HIP REVISION. THE PATIENTS WOUND WAS REOPENED AND PROVIDED FLUXOCACILIN ORAL. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: Wound Dehiscence
MAUDE report 15420959 ↗MalfunctionMar 23, 2022Difficult or Delayed Positioning; Difficult or Delayed Positioning
IT WAS REPORTED THE SCREW CONNECTING THE PROXIMAL BODY AND DISTAL STEM HAD A HARD TIME TIGHTENING AND LOOSENING. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13869070 ↗MalfunctionJan 10, 2022Difficult to Insert; Difficult to Insert
IT WAS REPORTED THE ARCOS 50MM PROXIMAL BODY CONE TRIAL WOULD NOT ENGAGE WITH THE STEM. NO ADVERSE EVENTS HAVE BEEN REPORTED AS A RESULT OF THE MALFUNCTION. ATTEMPTS HAVE BEEN MADE AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE REPORTED EVENT IS UNAVAILABLE AT THIS TIME.
Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions
MAUDE report 13206109 ↗
Other Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented devices
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-310Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented551 reports
- PINNACLE ALTRX 1221-36-052Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented481 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-32-320Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death314 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-36-720Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented1 death189 reports
- DJO SURGICAL 400-03-362Encore Medical, L.P. · Prosthesis, Hip, Semi-Constrained, Metal/Ceramic/Polymer, Cemented Or Non-Porous, Uncemented187 reports
- Anthology 71365705Smith & Nephew, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented176 reports
- BIOLOX DELTA 1365-40-710Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented170 reports
- PINNACLE GRIPTION 1217-32-054Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. · Prosthesis, hip, semi-constrained, metal/ceramic/polymer, cemented or non-porous, uncemented169 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page