Merit Maestro® 00884450038468Recalls & reported problems
Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2
All models of Merit Maestro (27)
Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy
- Adverse event reports
- 1
- Deaths reported
- 0
- Injuries reported
- 0
- Recalls naming it
- 0
Summary
The FDA's MAUDE database contains 1 adverse event report that list this exact device (DI 00884450038468), received between Jun 4, 2020 and Jun 4, 2020 — classified as 1 malfunction.
The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Detachment of Device or Device Component” (1 report).
Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.
Most reported problems
Device problems
- Detachment of Device or Device Component1
- Material Separation1
Patient problems
- No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1
Recent adverse event reports
The 1 most recent of 1 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.
MalfunctionJun 4, 2020Material Separation; Detachment of Device or Device Component; Material Separation; Detachment of Device or Device Component
THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A LEFT UTERINE FIBROID EMBOLIZATION [UFE] PROCEDURE ON (B)(6) 2020, THE MICROCATHETERS RADIOPAQUE MARKER BAND DETACHED WITHIN A PATIENT. THE PHYSICIAN HAD ACQUIRED RIGHT RETROGRADE FEMORAL ARTERY ACCESS AND HAD NEGOTIATED THE PATIENT'S COMMON ILIAC BIFURCATION WITH A GUIDEWIRE AND A 5F GUIDE CATHETER. DURING MICROCATHETER MANIPULATIONS OVER THE WIRE WITHIN THE PATIENT'S LEFT UTERINE ARTERY THE MARKER BAND DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN NOTED THE PATIENT'S ANATOMY WAS TORTUOUS AND VERY DIFFICULT TO NAVIGATE. THE RADIOPAQUE BAND BECAME EMBEDDED WITHIN THE PATIENT'S VASCULATURE SYSTEM THAT WAS FEEDING THE FIBROID. THE DECISION WAS MADE TO LEAVE THE FOREIGN BODY ACTING AS AN EMBOLIC WITHIN THE PATIENT. THE EMBOLIZATION PROCEDURE WAS SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED. THE OUTPATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL AND WAS DISCHARGED TO HOME WITHOUT FURTHER CONSEQUENCE.
Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient
MAUDE report 10119506 ↗
Other Catheter, continuous flush devices
- PROWLER SELECT 606-S255XMedos International Sàrl · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths980 reports
- PhenomTM 27 Catheter FG15150-0615-1SMicro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths139 reports
- MarathonTM 105-5056Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush124 reports
- MarksmanTM FA-55150-1030Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- Renegade™ HI-FLO™ Kit M001183020Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, continuous flush109 reports
- EkoSonic® 6779-002Boston Scientific Corporation · Catheter, Continuous Flush1 recall4 deaths56 reports
- Chameleon CH08-40-75USMozarc Medical US LLC · Catheter, continuous flush2 recalls4 reports
- RebarTM 105-5081-153Micro Therapeutics, Inc. · Catheter, continuous flush2 deaths102 reports
Sources and updates
- Device record: FDA GUDID, file dated Oct 13, 2026 · View this device in AccessGUDID ↗
- Adverse event reports: FDA MAUDE, file dated Oct 14, 2026 · each report above links to its original FDA record
- Recalls: FDA Medical Device Recalls, file dated Oct 16, 2026
- Page last rebuilt: Oct 18, 2026. Data downloaded through openFDA, which notes it is not validated for clinical or regulatory use.
How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page