Skip to content

MAK-NV™ 00884450088838Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 1

All models of MAK-NV (11)

Data updated Oct 18, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
4
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
4
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 4 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450088838), received between Oct 25, 2019 and Jul 16, 2025 — classified as 4 injuries.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. What reports can and can't tell you · How this data works · Data updated Oct 18, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 0 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 1 reportsAug 2025: 0 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520261
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture4
  • Material Separation4
  • Break2
  • Material Integrity Problem1

Patient problems

  • Foreign Body In Patient2
  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions2

Recent adverse event reports

The 4 most recent of 4 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryJul 16, 2025Break; Fracture; Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem; Break; Fracture; Material Separation; Material Integrity Problem

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PYELOSTOMY PROCEDURE, THE THIN NITINOL GUIDE WIRE BROKE AND THE TIP REMAINED IN THE PATIENT'S KIDNEY. THE DETACHED PIECE WAS REMOVED WITH A FOREIGN OBJECT REMOVAL SET.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22521302 ↗
  • InjuryMay 2, 2023Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT WHEN ATTEMPTING TO MANEUVER AROUND A KIDNEY STONE. THE FRONT END OF THE CATHETER NEAR THE RADIOPAQUE MARKER DETACHED. THE DEVICE REMAINED ON THE GUIDEWIRE AND WAS RETRIEVED ALONG WITH THE GUIDEWIRE. NO ADDITIONAL INTERVENTION PROCEDURE WAS NECESSARY.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16856474 ↗
  • InjuryMar 6, 2020Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A PERCUTANEOUS NEPHROSTOMY TUBE PLACEMENT PROCEDURE ON AN ELDERLY FEMALE PATIENT, A MICROPUNCTURE ACCESS GUIDEWIRE TIP DETACHED. THE PHYSICIAN WAS ATTEMPTING NON-VASCULAR ACCESS WITH ECO/FLUOROSCOPIC GUIDANCE AT THE LOWER CALYX OF THE KIDNEY. DURING WIRE MANIPULATIONS THROUGH AN ACCESS NEEDLE, 4CM OF THE DISTAL 0.018 GUIDEWIRE DETACHED. THE DETACHED FRAGMENT OF THE NON-VASCULAR ACCESS WIRE REMAINS WITHIN THE PATIENT'S KIDNEY. A POST-PROCEDURAL COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY [CT] SCAN WAS PERFORMED. CONSIDERING THE HEALTH CONDITIONS OF THE PATIENT AND THE EXISTING COMORBIDITIES, THE MEDICAL STAFF DECIDED NOT TO ATTEMPT TO RETRIEVE THE FOREIGN BODY FRAGMENT FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 9799391 ↗
  • InjuryOct 25, 2019Break; Fracture; Material Separation; Break; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT DURING A NEPHROSTOMY STENT IMPLANT PROCEDURE, THE ACCESS WIRE TIP DETACHED WITHIN THE PATIENTS LEFT INFERIOR RENAL POLE DURING WIRE MANIPULATIONS. THE PHYSICIAN WAS UNSUCCESSFUL IN RETRIEVING THE WIRE TIP WITH A VASCULAR SNARE. PROLONGATION OF HOSPITALIZATION WAS NECESSARY FOR CONTINUED OBSERVATION. THE PHYSICIAN STATES THAT A SMALL PIECE OF THE WIRE WAS LEFT WITHIN THE PATIENT'S RENAL COLLECTION SYSTEM. THE PATIENT WAS DISCHARGED TO HOME AND SCHEDULED FOR A FOLLOW UP APPOINTMENT AND POSSIBLE INTERVENTION.

    Patient problems: Foreign Body In Patient

    MAUDE report 9242430 ↗

Other NEEDLE, CATHETER devices

All NEEDLE, CATHETER devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page