Skip to content

Flex-Neck® 00884450330166Recalls & reported problems

Merit Medical Systems, Inc. · Class 2 · Implant

Data updated Oct 13, 2026 from official FDA records · Editorial policy

Adverse event reports
5
Deaths reported
0
Injuries reported
3
Recalls naming it
0

Summary

The FDA's MAUDE database contains 5 adverse event reports that list this exact device (DI 00884450330166), received between Jun 10, 2020 and Aug 20, 2025 — classified as 3 injuries, 2 malfunctions.

The most frequently reported specific device problem is “Fracture” (4 reports).

Reports come from manufacturers, hospitals and patients and are not verified by the FDA. A report does not prove the device caused the event, and counts can't be used to compare devices or estimate failure rates. How this data works · Data updated Oct 13, 2026.

Reports received per month

Nov 2023: 0 reportsDec 2023: 0 reportsJan 2024: 0 reportsFeb 2024: 0 reportsMar 2024: 0 reportsApr 2024: 0 reportsMay 2024: 0 reportsJun 2024: 0 reportsJul 2024: 0 reportsAug 2024: 0 reportsSep 2024: 1 reportsOct 2024: 0 reportsNov 2024: 0 reportsDec 2024: 0 reportsJan 2025: 0 reportsFeb 2025: 0 reportsMar 2025: 0 reportsApr 2025: 0 reportsMay 2025: 0 reportsJun 2025: 0 reportsJul 2025: 0 reportsAug 2025: 2 reportsSep 2025: 0 reportsOct 2025: 0 reportsNov 2025: 0 reportsDec 2025: 0 reportsJan 2026: 0 reportsFeb 2026: 0 reportsMar 2026: 0 reportsApr 2026: 0 reportsMay 2026: 0 reportsJun 2026: 0 reportsJul 2026: 0 reportsAug 2026: 0 reportsSep 2026: 0 reportsOct 2026: 0 reports2024202520262
Last 36 months. The most recent month may be incomplete.

Most reported problems

Device problems

  • Fracture4
  • Material Separation2
  • Defective Device1
  • Fluid/Blood Leak1
  • Material Fragmentation1
  • Migration1
  • Obstruction of Flow1

Patient problems

  • No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions4
  • No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient1

Recent adverse event reports

The 5 most recent of 5 reports, in the reporter's own words as published by the FDA.

  • InjuryAug 20, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES DURING THE CATHETER PLACEMENT PROCEDURE, THE CATHETER BROKE WHILE BEING PULLED THROUGH THE SUBCUTANEOUS TUNNEL. AS A RESULT, THE CATHETER WAS COMPLETELY REMOVED FROM THE PERITONEAL CAVITY. A REPLACEMENT PERITONEAL CATHETER OF THE SAME REFERENCE WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22853847 ↗
  • InjuryAug 5, 2025Fracture; Material Separation; Fracture; Material Separation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THE CATHETER WAS PLACED INTO THE PELVIS, AND WHEN THE CLINICIAN ATTEMPTED TO TUNNEL IT USING A METAL TUNNELER, WHILE EXITING THE SKIN THE CATHETER BROKE AND SEPARATED AT THE SECOND CUFF. THE CLINICIAN WAS ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY RETRIEVE THE BROKEN PIECE OF THE CATHETER. A REPLACEMENT CATHETER WAS USED TO COMPLETE THE PROCEDURE. NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCE TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 22717355 ↗
  • InjurySep 19, 2024Obstruction of Flow; Defective Device; Migration; Obstruction of Flow; Defective Device; Migration

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT AN 82-YEAR-OLD MALE PATIENT PRESENTED IN A WHEELCHAIR CONSCIOUS AND ORIENTED. THE FUNCTIONALITY OF THE CATHETER WAS EVALUATED. AN ABDOMINAL X-RAY WAS PERFORMED SHOWING THE CATHETER HAD MIGRATED OUTSIDE THE PELVIC CAVITY. OUT OF POSITION. THE DRAINAGE CATHETER WAS TESTED, AND IT WAS FOUND THAT THE PD CATHETER WAS OCCLUDED AND WOULD NOT DRAIN. THE PHYSICIAN ORDERED THE PD CATHETER REPLACEMENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL. THERE WERE NO ADDITIONAL PATIENT CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 20261108 ↗
  • MalfunctionDec 20, 2022Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture; Fluid/Blood Leak; Fracture

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES THAT A PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PROCEDURE THE PHYSICIAN WAS ABLE TO PLACE THE CATHETER WITHOUT TROUBLE. ONCE THE PHYSICIAN WENT TO FLUSH THE CATHETER HE NOTICED IT WAS LEAKING. THE PHYSICIAN PLACED A PURSE STRING SUTURE AND TRIED AGAIN AND THE CATHETER CONTINUED TO LEAK. PHYSICIAN DECIDED TO REMOVE THE CATHETER AND PLACE ANOTHER CATHETER. ONCE THE PHYSICIAN REMOVED THE INITIAL CATHETER HE ATTEMPTED TO FLUSH IT AND THE CATHETER HAD A HOLE IN IT.

    Patient problems: No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions

    MAUDE report 16016300 ↗
  • MalfunctionJun 10, 2020Fracture; Material Fragmentation; Fracture; Material Fragmentation

    THE ACCOUNT ALLEGES DURING A PROCEDURE, WHILE TUNNELING THE CATHETER TO THE EXIT SITE, THE CATHETER BROKE AT THE FIRST CUFF. THE CUFF WAS SUCCESSFULLY REMOVED FROM THE PATIENT. THE PATIENT TOLERATED THE PROCEDURE WELL WITH NO ADDITIONAL CONSEQUENCES TO REPORT.

    Patient problems: No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient

    MAUDE report 10141381 ↗

Other Catheter, peritoneal, long-term indwelling devices

All Catheter, peritoneal, long-term indwelling devices →

Sources and updates

How reports and recalls are matched · Editorial policy · Report an error on this page